Skip to content

ASLEval: Measuring Privacy Exposure Displacement in LLM Agent Sessions

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 15 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Privacy exposure displacement, the mismatch between a local evaluation proxy and target-grounded session exposure, and ASLEval, an authorization-aware framework that pre-registers a hidden target set, measures all declared visible exits, and reserves internal traces for diagnosis are introduced.

Abstract

Privacy evaluations of tool-using LLM agents often inspect a designated action, final response, or attacker report. These local proxies can miss unauthorized exposure elsewhere in a multi-step session and lack common ground truth across outlets, reports, and tool paths. We introduce privacy exposure displacement, the mismatch between a local evaluation proxy and target-grounded session exposure, and ASLEval, an authorization-aware framework that pre-registers a hidden target set, measures all declared visible exits, and reserves internal traces for diagnosis. Across multiple enterprise-style environments and independently implemented runtimes, we observe three recurring patterns. An expected-outlet-only view misses 46.9% of exposure recovered by the visible-exit union; attacker self-reports combine omissions with high false discovery; and schema-aligned internal evidence usually precedes visible exposure at the request/probe level. Reducing model-visible returns changes this path but can eliminate normal-task success. Independent human review supports the adjudication pipeline while identifying harder console and candidate cases. These findings motivate benchmarks that declare the complete visible boundary, ground claims in pre-specified targets and authorization, and report privacy together with task utility.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

The Claws in Plain Sight: Unauthorized Context Disclosure through LLM Agent Tool Calls

LLM agents routinely construct tool-call arguments from user profiles, conversation history, retrieved documents, and prior tool results. However, legitimate access to contextual information does not imply authorization to transmit that information for every purpose or destination. We present Claw in Plain Sight, an au...

Ben Dong, Zhonghao Guo, Tianyi Lu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Confuse the Model, Control the Flow: Understanding and Mitigating Privacy Leakage from LLM Agents with Information Flow Control

Personal AI agents built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly given access to a user's private data and communications in order to provide personalized assistance. This access creates a persistent privacy risk: the agent must decide whether a given sensitive information should be disclosed to a particular p...

Minsun Shim, Ramisha Raida Karim, Ruthwik Jakkula et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

ToolMinimize: Auditing and Rewriting LLM Agent Tool Calls to Minimize Privacy Exposure

System{, a middleware that intercepts tool calls and rewrites their arguments to the minimum data necessary for tool functionality, combining schema-aware necessity analysis with four operations: removal, generalization, substitution, and truncation is presented.

Wen-Biao Li, Yuqing Xu · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

When Agents Learn to Be You: Benchmarking Privacy Leakage, Impersonation Risk, and Defenses in Persona Skills

AntiSkillBench is introduced, an end-to-end benchmark for evaluating risks and defenses across the persona-skill pipeline, and experiments show that persona-skill risks persist across agent backbones and distillation protocols, extending from explicit attributes to communication styles and personality traits.

Yongli Xiang, Zhi-Fang Zhang, Bojun Yang et al. · 2 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Audit Without Verification: When LLM Accountability Layers Relay Rather Than Check

Multi-agent LLM pipelines increasingly span organisational boundaries; when a fault surfaces, someone must determine where it entered. The artifact available is rarely a full execution trace: it is the reports each agent filed, and a filed report can state a conclusion alongside its observations. Using a pre-registered...

Paul-Peter Arslan · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

ClawSentry: A Progressive Multi-Tier Security Monitor for Safeguarding Autonomous LLM Agents

This work argues that agentic risk is progressive: it can enter at four loci of the agent control loop--skill admission, invocation-time intent, execution-time effect, and post-action consequence--while a denied dangerous objective can reappear across surface forms, tools, or turns.

Kai Wang, Zeming Wei, Biaojie Zeng et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.