This paper examines how eight EU and international competence frameworks codify AI-related knowledge for STEAM educators, using a dual analytical lens comprising AI-TPACK and STEAMCompEdu and proposes three emerging theoretical extensions to AI-TPACK to address the identified lacunae.
Abstract
Competence frameworks function as structured knowledge codification systems: authoritative, domain-wide representations of professional knowledge that define what counts as competence within a field and how it should be organised. As such, they constitute a form of professional knowledge encyclopaedia, structured to comprehensively map an emerging or established knowledge domain. This paper examines how eight EU and international competence frameworks codify AI-related knowledge for STEAM educators, using a dual analytical lens comprising AI-TPACK and STEAMCompEdu. Read through this dual lens, the cross-framework analysis identifies four knowledge dimensions insufficiently addressed in the existing landscape: interdisciplinary pedagogical knowledge, creative-aesthetic AI knowledge, ethics as embedded disciplinary practice, and inquiry-oriented AI pedagogy. Based on these findings, the paper proposes three emerging theoretical extensions to AI-TPACK to address the identified lacunae and discusses implications for the design of structured professional knowledge codification systems that better represent complex, interdisciplinary, and rapidly evolving knowledge domains.
This paper argues that clarifying AI competencies for teaching requires more than listing skills: it requires a coherent account of what these competencies involve, how they are enacted in practice, and what evidence can support teacher learning and professional judgment over time.
Teresa M. Ober, Caitlin Tenison, Geoffrey Phelps et al.· ETS Research Report Series· 0 citations
A competency-based AI readiness framework is developed that links implementation challenges with readiness requirements and role-specific competencies and develops conceptual propositions that can be examined in future empirical research.
Arno Onnen· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
The research re-specifies dual-factor dynamics for GenAI-mediated knowledge work, demonstrating that enablers and inhibitors operate as independent epistemic forces rather than as opposing poles and extends KM scholarship on knowledge risk by identifying a class of AI-specific risks that conventional governance instrum...
Wen-Dai Yang, Sarthak Singh, S. Alshibani et al.· Journal of Knowledge Managem...· 0 citations
This paper conceptualizes Interdisciplinary Knowledge Integration and Application (IKIA) as a critical cognitive competence within the Cognitive Psychology Dimension of the VFC Competence Framework. In response to increasing demands for interdisciplinary problem-solving in education and workforce development, IKIA is...
Mohammad Moharram, A. Salem, Y. Eldin et al.· International Journal of Voc...· 0 citations
This study examines and refines an existing competence model by incorporating perspectives from diverse stakeholder groups and elaborated to provide an empirically grounded, didactically actionable framework for teacher education and future research.
Luca Mikula· The European Educational Res...· 0 citations
This study develops a conceptual framework that positions AI literacy as an extension of digital literacy within contemporary knowledge work environments and proposes a theoretical framework explaining how human capabilities interact with intelligent technologies to support knowledge creation, decision-making, and orga...
Kha Huy Tran· Business Information Review· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.