In this opening chapter, we set the stage for the book by describing both the opportunities and risks that artificial intelligence (AI) presents as it becomes increasingly embedded in critical domains such as healthcare, education, transportation, energy, conservation, and security. We argue that researchers and practitioners have a dual responsibility: to push the boundaries of technical innovation while also ensuring that AI systems are deployed in ways that are transparent, fair, and accountable. We begin by explaining the book&s;s structure. In the first half, we share case studies where AI methods—ranging from optimization and reinforcement learning to game theory and deep learning-are applied to concrete societal problems and evaluated in real-world settings. In the second half, we turn to the cross-cutting issues that surface regardless of domain, including questions of privacy, fairness, security, and governance. By weaving together technical depth and social reflection, our goal is to offer both a resource for practitioners who want to understand how AI can be effectively applied to social good and a guide for scholars and policymakers interested in the ethical and institutional frameworks needed to support responsible use.
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
An algorithm is proposed which leverages disentangled semantic factors to generate adversarial perturbation by altering controlled semantic attributes to fool the learner towards various "adversarial" targets.
Haonan Qiu, Chaowei Xiao, Lei Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 208 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
Prabha Jha used her experience with MIT Open Learning’s program for senior executives to develop AI solutions for her employer, Verizon, and to write a book.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.