ABSTRACT The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas system has facilitated gene editing of different organisms. Specifically, programmable base editing enables stable conversion of a single nucleotide to another nucleotide without causing DNA double-strand breaks. Cas9-derived base editors, including adenine and cytidine base editors, catalyze the formation of transition mutations with high efficiency. The third-generation cytidine base editors comprise a nickase-Cas9 fused to a cytidine deaminase and uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor to enable the transition from C:G to T:A. We observed that in certain Streptomyces spp., this cytidine base editor produced C:G to G:C transversions at a surprisingly high rate of 44, while in other strains, it yielded the expected C:G to T:A transition mutations. There was also a notable timing difference for base editing between distinct strains. Bioinformatics analysis revealed differences in DNA mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair pathways, including the presence of uvrD helicase gene only in the C:G to G:C transversion strain. Expression of uvrD in the C:G to T:A transition strain led to higher rates of C:G to G:C transversions. These discoveries will aid in the development of efficient C:G to G:C base editors. IMPORTANCE Base editors are useful tools that allow genetic engineers to precisely change single bases in an organism's genome. Most base editors catalyze transition mutations (e.g., A-to-G or C to-T). Transversion mutations, which convert a purine base to a pyrimidine base, have been described but operate at much lower efficiency. Here, we describe a surprising discovery that a transition base editor produced high-efficiency transversion mutations in a species of Streptomyces. This information was used to engineer a high-efficiency transversion base editor. Base editors are useful tools that allow genetic engineers to precisely change single bases in an organism's genome. Most base editors catalyze transition mutations (e.g., A-to-G or C to-T). Transversion mutations, which convert a purine base to a pyrimidine base, have been described but operate at much lower efficiency. Here, we describe a surprising discovery that a transition base editor produced high-efficiency transversion mutations in a species of Streptomyces. This information was used to engineer a high-efficiency transversion base editor.
The emergence of CRISPR base editors signifies a pivotal shift in genome editing, moving beyond the "cut-and-paste" approach into an era of precise "chemical rewriting." While early editors including CBEs and ABEs enabled efficient base transitions by combining deaminases with Cas9 nickase, their core mechanism limited...
This review focuses on the action mode of different base editors, highlights their interplays with the TLS, summarizes their potential therapeutic applications and discusses perspective strategies to improve precision and expand targeting scope.
R. Tao, Min Li, Tong-Yun Luo et al.· Biotechnology Advances· 0 citations
A detailed protocol for performing gene editing using an adenine base editor (ABE) to induce a single A-G transition mutation in a gene of therapeutic relevance is provided, enabling the production of cell models suited to the study of both dominant and recessive mutations.
Shun Zhang, B. P. Hubbard· Methods in molecular biology· 0 citations
These developments show that base editing has moved from a proof-of-concept to a clinically-ready platform with incredible speed, and that the central questions for the field, perhaps, concern the pace at which the surrounding technology can keep up with base editors themselves.
Fabio Catalano· Methods in molecular biology· 0 citations
CRISPR-based genome editors are fundamentally limited by their requirement for double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), restricted transgene cargo capacity, and reliance on error-prone endogenous DNA repair mechanisms. Non–long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons—especially the site-specific R2 element—offer a mechanist...
Liang-Zheng Fu, Ya-Chao Wu, Xiao-Hua Jin et al.· Frontiers in Genome Editing· 0 citations