It is argued that understanding how perceived trustworthiness is formed and expressed by users can provide a basis for human oversight of AI systems in the wild and how capturing, measuring, and aggregating perceived trustworthiness can be incorporated into oversight processes without substituting accountability mechanisms.
Calls for “trustworthy AI” have become ubiquitous in policy and industry, yet the term remains conceptually underspecified. In earlier work (Dorsch & Deroy, 2024), we argued that moral trustworthiness is neither possible nor necessary for AI decision-support systems (AI-DSS), and indeed unethical to pursue, since it ri...
John Dorsch, Maximilian Moll, Ophélia Deroy· Philosophy & Technology· 0 citations
The paper critiques the EU AI Act’s deprioritising human trust, advocating for enhanced individual rights and citizen participation in AI governance, to mitigate trust gaps and the declining role of fiduciary relationships.
The present study replicates the path model developed by Karg, Ritz and Asprion (2025) using a business sample to assess the robustness of the original findings and to advance theory building, which largely supports the original findings.
Jona Karg, J. Jäger, Petra Maria Asprion· AHFE International· 0 citations
The findings suggest that trustworthy AI integration requires addressing pre-existing structural failures before introducing algorithmic decision support, and offer design recommendations for AI-supported appraisal systems, with implications for HCI research and organizational practice.
Andreas Harnindito, Akshat Sawarni· Proceedings of the 2026 Euro...· 0 citations
The integration of AI into larger technical infrastructures has made the alignment of human trust with system trustworthiness, known as trust calibration, a critical engineering concern, since misplaced trust in either direction leads to operational and safety risks. While conceptual frameworks provide a strong foundat...
Yun-Tian Ding, N. Herbaut, C. Salinesi· 0 citations
The use of AI in courts is highly contested, with positions ranging from outright opposition to unmitigated enthusiasm. However, normative assessments of its deployment often rely on standards or analogies that are unclear in their pedigree, coherence and scope conditions. This article explores how theories of legiti...
A. Follesdal, M. Langford· Law and Governance· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
