Skip to content
Review Open access

Salvage surgery for free flap failure in the maxillofacial region: a comprehensive review of principles and outcomes

Ziad Albash Wajih Kashkash Anton Sergeevich Sharapo Zaderenko Igor Alexandrovich Ushenko Ilya Aleksandrovich Saltykov Egor Michaylovich Hassan Alsayed Hachem
Jul 2026 · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · Vol 88, pp. 5088 - 5100 · 0 citations · 71 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Free-flap failure, while uncommon, demands a systematic, individualized, and multidisciplinary response, and with timely intervention and an appropriate reconstructive strategy – whether microvascular, pedicled, or prosthetic – salvage surgery can successfully restore form, function, and hope, transforming a surgical crisis into a manageable clinical challenge.

Abstract

Background: Free tissue transfer is the cornerstone of complex maxillofacial reconstruction, offering high success rates (90–95%) but carrying the risk of devastating flap failure in 1.5–5.8% of cases. When failure occurs, it necessitates urgent, strategic decision-making to mitigate morbidity and preserve oncological and functional outcomes. Objective: This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the principles, decision-making frameworks, and outcomes of salvage surgery following free-flap failure in the maxillofacial region. Methods/findings: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted, integrating data from clinical studies, case series, and systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2024. Key themes included the etiology and timing of flap failure (predominantly venous thrombosis within 48 hours), the critical distinction between flap salvage and salvage surgery, and a multifactorial decision matrix incorporating patient, defect, oncologic, and institutional factors. Reconstructive options range from second free flaps (success rates ~67–73%) and pedicled flaps (e.g., pectoralis major) to prosthetic rehabilitation. Immediate salvage is preferred in stable patients, whereas a staged “bridge and stage” approach using negative pressure wound therapy is safer in compromised settings. Functional outcomes vary by site and technique, but salvage surgery can significantly reduce pain and improve quality of life, with curative potential in select oncologic recurrences. Conclusion: Free-flap failure, while uncommon, demands a systematic, individualized, and multidisciplinary response. With timely intervention and an appropriate reconstructive strategy – whether microvascular, pedicled, or prosthetic – salvage surgery can successfully restore form, function, and hope, transforming a surgical crisis into a manageable clinical challenge.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

The Fibula Free Flap as Used for Reconstruction in Patients With Oral Cavity Malignancy: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT Objectives The fibula free flap is a widely used means of reconstructing the maxilla and mandible. It is used for a variety of indications, including for reconstruction after resection of a benign or malignant tumor, osteoradionecrosis, or trauma. The current literature reports outcomes for the fibula free fla...

Rohan Vuppala, Nicholas Owings, Forest Weir · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Revisiting the Lateral Arm Free Flap for oral defects: a case series on flap viability and primary donor site closure

The reconstruction of complex oral cavity defects following oncologic resection requires versatile soft tissue flaps that restore tissue volume while minimizing donor-site morbidity. While the Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF) is a standard option, it is associated with conspicuous donor site morbidity [1]. This study ev...

S. Shaltout, A. Amin, M. Zedan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Flaps for Lower Limb Diabetic Wound Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes and Techniques

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major cause of limb loss and mortality. Flap reconstruction is a vital limb salvage technique, but comparative evidence remains limited. Objective: This review evaluates outcomes across flap types and identifies factors influencing success. Material and Method: A systematic...

Aquarina Ashari Sukahar, Devina Swantara, A. Ardan · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Use of Flow-through Fibula Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Abstract Background The application of the flow-through free fibula flap (FTFFF) in head and neck reconstruction is understudied. This systematic review evaluates indications, techniques, and outcomes of FTFFF in reconstructive surgery. Methods A systematic review of the current literature reviewing FTFFF in head and n...

C. Ernstrom, L. Kiel, Qin-Xiao Wu et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Alternative Soft Tissue Free Flaps in Multi-Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND Multi-flap reconstruction is often required for extensive head and neck defects, especially in recurrent disease, prior reconstruction, or vessel-depleted necks. While traditional donor sites remain foundational, the reliability of alternative soft tissue free flaps is less defined. METHODS This retrospect...

Rami Elmorsi, Edward I. Chang, Erica Y. Xue et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.