Artificial Intelligence in Informal Digital Learning of English: A Systematic Review of Engagement Mechanisms and Learning Processes in Intelligent Learning Systems
Aug 2026· Journal of Intelligence· Vol 14, pp. 189· 0 citations· 57 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Artificial intelligence-mediated IDLE may serve as a site for activating adaptive intelligence and learner self-regulation through context-sensitive evaluation, regulation, and behavioral adaptation.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) creates personalized, interactive, and low-risk learning opportunities for informal digital learning of English (IDLE). However, effective AI tools do not necessarily lead learners to engage autonomously or productively. Guided by the person–behavior–environment framework of social cognitive theory, this systematic review synthesized 58 empirical studies published in SSCI-indexed journals between 2020 and 2025 to examine how AI affordances are translated into learning behaviors and intelligence-related processes in AI-mediated IDLE. Speech recognition, natural language processing, and personalized feedback were the most frequently investigated affordances, providing opportunities to observe, imitate, and adapt authentic language use. Engagement was mediated primarily by emotional, motivational, and self-belief mechanisms. These mechanisms could facilitate or hinder engagement depending on technological accuracy, perceived human responsiveness, learner goals, and proficiency-task alignment. From an intelligence perspective, the findings illustrate how learners evaluate AI-generated information, regulate affect and motivation, calibrate self-perceptions, and adapt learning behaviors. Thus, AI-mediated IDLE may serve as a site for activating adaptive intelligence and learner self-regulation through context-sensitive evaluation, regulation, and behavioral adaptation.
Artificial intelligence applications, particularly adaptive learning platforms and conversational agents, effectively support reading development by giving feedback, personal learning experiences, and opportunities for learners to monitor their own progress.
Ruba Salim Abdulaziz Al Rawas, Maslawati Bint Mohammed, Intan Farahana Kamsin· Arab World English Journal· 0 citations
The paper argues for a human-centered hybrid model in which AI supports routine instructional functions while teachers retain responsibility for cultural interpretation, emotional engagement, critical thinking, critical thinking, and meaningful interpersonal communication.
Jihan Bayram· Research Journal of Maaref U...· 0 citations
This Element provides the first comprehensive synthesis of AI-IDLE research and practice, grounded in an integration of proactive language learning theory and cultural-historical activity theory, and illustrates how learners negotiate resources and navigate diverse sociotechnical environments to engage in AI-IDLE.
G. Liu, Ju Seong Lee· Cambridge University Press e...· 2 citations· ⚡1
Overall, the findings suggest that structured AI-IDLE can provide a digitally mediated context for intelligence-relevant adaptive learning by supporting communicative performance while fostering affective conditions conducive to its development.
Di-Fei Jia, Xi Chen, Yun-Song Wang· Journal of Intelligence· 1 citation
The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in educational settings has catalyzed significant scholarly interest in how these technologies reshape two fundamental dimensions of learner development: student autonomy and student identity. This narrative literature review synthesizes evidence from 30 pee...
Saeeda Khoso, Junaid Ali Sahito, Samia Saif· Journal of Global Social Tra...· 0 citations
A human-centred paradigm in which GenAI does not replace but complements teachers is supported, in which GenAI can offer valuable scaffolding or simply produce answers is defined.
Ke-Rong Huang· Journal of Humanities and Cu...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.