Skip to content
#gene editing Editorial Open access

Editorial: Genetically modified (GM) and genome-edited (GE) plants for achieving sustainable agriculture

Aug 2026 · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · 2 references

Abstract

Agriculture stands at a critical crossroads. Escalating challenges from climate change, population growth, resource constraints, and complex biotic and abiotic stresses demand crop improvement strategies that are faster, more precise, and more sustainable than conventional breeding alone. Genetically modified (GM) and genome-edited (GEd) technologies have emerged as powerful complementary tools to enhance resilience, productivity, nutritional quality, and environmental compatibility (Chen et al., 2024;Ahmadikhah et al., 2025;Bahmankar et al., 2026). The eleven articles in this Research Topic illustrate the rapid evolution of plant biotechnology-from foundational genome-editing platforms to functional trait validation, accelerated breeding, biosafety assessment, and responsible deployment. This Editorial synthesizes key themes, highlights synergies, and charts pathways toward sustainable agricultural systems.Plant genetic engineering has advanced from random transgene integration to precise modification of endogenous genes. Ahmadikhah et al. (2025) trace the progression from RNAi and early nucleases (ZFNs, TALENs) to versatile CRISPR/Cas systems, noted for their simplicity, efficiency, and reduced off-target effects. Yu et al. (2025) show that heterologous gene expression can outperform endogenous counterparts, underscoring the importance of smart gene selection. These advances support complex trait modifications for multi-stress tolerance and quality (Chen et al., 2024), proving especially powerful in polyploid species (Li and Iqbal, 2024).Genome editing has become indispensable for functional genomics and rapid cultivar development. Jayakody et al. ( 2024 2024) exemplify both the power and complexity of this approach: knockout of StNRL1 enhanced late blight resistance but increased susceptibility to early blight, highlighting defense trade-offs and the need for multi-omics integration. 2024) provide biosafety insights, showing that transgenic maize and glyphosate influence rhizosphere microbial communities in ways modulated by genotype and management.Successful adoption requires effective co-existence with conventional and organic systems. As Caradus (2025) emphasizes, coexistence is achievable through science-based stewardship, including appropriate isolation distances, temporal and physical barriers, and robust supply chain segregation. Countries with extensive organic and GM cultivation demonstrate that transparent governance and farmer communication minimize adventitious presence while preserving market choice. Advances in detection, traceability, and transgene-free editing (Ahmed et al., 2024) support proportionate oversight that balances innovation with safety. Public acceptance depends on transparent risk communication, stakeholder engagement, and equitable access-particularly for smallholder farmers.This Research Topic opens exciting horizons: enhanced editing efficiency in complex genomes, strategic stacking of beneficial alleles, integration with synthetic biology and AI-driven design, and accelerated use of crop wild relatives for climate resilience. Challenges remain, including mitigation of pleiotropic effects, long-term ecological stability, regulatory harmonization, and equitable scaling. Overcoming these requires deepened interdisciplinary collaboration and sustained investment in contained trials, post-release monitoring, and knowledge-sharing platforms.The studies in this Research Topic demonstrate that GM and GEd technologies have matured into indispensable pillars of sustainable agriculture. By integrating precision editing, accelerated breeding, functional genomics, and rigorous biosafety assessment, we can develop crops that are more resilient, productive, and environmentally harmonious. Realizing these potential demands adaptive regulation, transparent stakeholder engagement, equitable access, and global collaboration. As pressures on food systems intensify, these innovations offer genuine hope for nourishing a growing population while safeguarding planetary boundaries. The future lies not in choosing between technologies, but in responsibly harnessing them to build resilient, sustainable, and inclusive food systems for generations to come.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#gene editing Review Sep 2026

Unlocking non-model organisms with CRISPR-Cas: A roadmap for sustainable biotechnology.

It is concluded that bridging the gap between foundational CRISPR research and its real-world applications is imperative and future efforts should focus on democratizing tools via open-source platforms, advancing delivery systems, and fostering sustainable innovation through synthetic biology integration to fully realize the transformative potential of genome editing in organisms beyond model organisms.

S. Sarsaiya, Archana Jain, Jishuang Chen et al. · 2 citations
#gene editing Review Open access Aug 2026

Overcoming Therapy Resistance in Ovarian Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Emerging Therapeutic Strategies

This review summarizes emerging therapeutic strategies for EOC, their mechanisms of action, and their potential to overcome treatment resistance, and covers molecularly targeted therapies, immunotherapies, metabolic and epigenetic approaches, cellular and gene therapies, targeted drug-delivery systems, and locoregional and physical modalities.

Zofia Pietrasik, Mikołaj Kapała, Joanna Pietrasik et al. · 0 citations
#gene editing Review Open access Aug 2026

Environmental Risk Assessment and Confinement of Genetically Engineered Trees with an Emphasis on Vegetative Reproduction.

Genetic engineering (GE) and gene editing may endow traits to trees such as increased biomass and the production of novel biomaterials. Long-lived organisms such as trees might be subject to biotechnology-related risks that could be different than those of annual row crops. Those risks could be relevant to production in engineered plantations and beyond plantations to natural forests. Therefore, appropriate risk regulation is important to assure biosafety of commercialized engineered trees. In addition to gene flow via sexual reproduction, vegetative reproduction might play an additional role in environmental "exposure" risk relative to transgene dispersal in GE tree plantations. While vegetative reproduction is beneficial for preserving desired genetic traits during tree propagation, it may lead to proximal clonal spread in the field. Although the environmental risks associated with vegetative reproduction of GE trees are recognized in commercial forestry, there are few field-based environmental risk assessment (ERA) studies on dispersal risks of self-propagated GE trees. GE or gene editing of target genes involved in the vegetative propagation processes may be useful to mitigate environmental risks of clonal spread through vegetative reproduction. This review provides updates for recent field test results of GE and gene edited trees. Gene candidates related to vegetative reproduction including adventitious shooting (AS) and adventitious rooting (AR) are discussed herein as a means to mitigate unintended clonal spread from GE tree plantations.

Yongil Yang, C. N. Stewart · 0 citations
#gene editing Review Aug 2026

Immunogenic cell death in CNS diseases: From bench to bedside.

The central nervous system (CNS) harbors a distinct immune memory programming system, wherein immunogenic cell death (ICD) acts as a pivotal signaling hub. A spectrum of insults, from systemic metabolic dysfunction to local protein aggregation and ionic dyshomeostasis, can provoke ICD in neurons, glia, and resident immune cells. This process orchestrates the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from distinct subcellular compartments. These DAMPs synergistically initiate both innate trained immunity (TI), characterized by profound metabolic-epigenetic reprogramming, and antigen-specific adaptive immune responses that traverse the blood-brain barrier. Together, these pathways constitute an integral network of central immune surveillance. Crucially, this ICD-driven immune programming exhibits a striking functional dichotomy depending on the pathological context. In non-neoplastic conditions such as neural injury and neurodegenerative diseases, uncontrolled ICD signaling can establish a pathological trained immune memory, driving a self-perpetuating cycle of chronic neuroinflammation and tissue damage. Conversely, within the tumor microenvironment of malignancies like glioma, the adaptive immune responses elicited by ICD are frequently subverted by potent immunosuppressive mechanisms, culminating in tumor immune escape. This review dissects the differential regulatory mechanisms of ICD-mediated immune memory in CNS tumors versus non-tumor diseases. We aim to elucidate the molecular switches that govern the transition of this immune program from a beneficial, compensatory state to a pathological, detrimental phenotype. By exploring emerging therapeutic strategies, including gene editing, nanomaterials, and bioactive phytochemicals that precisely target ICD pathways, we provide a theoretical framework for understanding CNS immune homeostasis and for the rational design of precision immunotherapies.

Unknown authors · 0 citations
#gene editing Open access Aug 2026

Programmable RNA targeting with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) effector Cas7-11 in zebrafish embryos and mammalian cells

Findings establish Cas7-11 as a precise and efficient RNA knockdown tool for functional studies in embryonic development and stem cell biology, providing a versatile alternative to DNA-based gene-editing approaches.

Huan Yan, Imtiaz Ul Hassan, Kai Yan et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts