Skip to content
Review Open access

THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITH MACHINES: A REVIEW OF CLINICAL TRIALS AND PSYCHOSOCIAL OUTCOMES OF AI-POWERED CHATBOTS IN MANAGING DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT) · Vol 18, pp. 21-34 · 0 citations · 29 references

TL;DR

Meta-analysis results demonstrated that AIpowered chatbots were effective in reducing social anxiety, and therapeutic alliance with machines reached a mean of 3.84 within five days, comparable to human-led therapies.

Abstract

Mood and anxiety disorders impose a substantial burden on public health, and limited access to mental health professionals has intensified the need for digital tools [1]. These technologies contribute to improved psychological outcomes through cognitive restructuring and facilitation of emotion regulation processes [2]. The present study aims to investigate the effectiveness and psychosocial outcomes of AIpowered chatbots in managing depression and anxiety. Inclusion criteria comprised clinical trials and interventional studies involving adolescents and adults with clinical symptoms, while exclusion criteria included technical studies and reports lacking clinical data. A systematic search was conducted in the OpenAlex database covering the period from 2020 to 2025. The selection process began with 955 records, and following literature screening, 28 studies were selected for data extraction. Data extraction focused on primary outcomes including depression and anxiety scores, as well as therapeutic alliance indicators. Risk of bias assessment was performed using validated tools, and findings were synthesized through narrative synthesis and meta-analysis methods. Meta-analysis results demonstrated that these interventions were effective in reducing social anxiety, with a Hedges' g effect size of 0.36 and a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.29 to 0.43, with 0% heterogeneity [3]. Furthermore, a reduction in depressive symptoms yielded an effect size of 0.64 with a 95% confidence interval between 0.42 and 0.66 and heterogeneity of 95% [4]. Findings elucidated that therapeutic alliance with machines reached a mean of 3.84 within five days, comparable to human-led therapies [5]. The paucity of valid longitudinal data and reliance on selfreported user assessments constitute the primary limitations of the existing evidence in this domain. AIpowered chatbots are recognized as effective complements to traditional therapies and facilitate equitable access to mental health care across diverse populations.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy of psychological and behavioral interventions for depressive symptoms in people with epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Depression is a common and clinically important comorbidity in people with epilepsy and is associated with poorer quality of life, impaired treatment adherence, increased disease burden, and worse clinical outcomes. Psychological and behavioral interventions have been increasingly applied in this population;...

Yi-Ming Sun, Jie Wang, Yu-Fu Guan et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Sep 2026

Advances in Research on the Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Chatbots for Alleviating Anxiety and Depression Symptoms: A Literature Review

Overall, AI CBT chatbots appear most defensible as accessible self-help or adjunctive tools rather than replacements for therapist-led CBT, and carefully supervised human-AI models of care.

Qing-Yang She · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Efficacy of Online Dialectical Behavior Therapy Interventions on Emotional and Behavioral Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is an evidence-based, skills-based intervention originally developed for chronic suicidality and borderline personality disorder and later adapted transdiagnostically for disorders involving emotional and behavioral dysregulation. Online and app-delivered DBT adaptations have prolifer...

Pulwasha Anwar, Mashat Zahra, Hajira Javed et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Conversational AI for mental health: a systematic review of effectiveness and design

This systematic review synthesised evidence on the applications, effectiveness, engagement, acceptability, and responsible design of large language model (LLM)- and AI-based conversational agents for mental health and psychological well-being. Following the PRISMA 2020 framework, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect were...

Anisa Sholiha Mia, Rudyanto Rudyanto · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Mentalization-based treatment for eating disorders: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Evidence for MBT and MBT-informed interventions in EDs remains preliminary and is insufficient to establish comparative effectiveness or sustained benefit, so future research should use adequately powered, methodologically rigorous studies to clarify which people are most likely to benefit from MBT.

K. Salucci, Sela Scott, Amelia Austin · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The Effectiveness of Digital Psycho-Oncology Interventions on Anxiety and Depression in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.

BackgroundCancer survivors frequently experience anxiety and depression, which can impair quality of life. Digital psycho-oncology interventions represent a promising strategy to address these psychosocial concerns.AimThis systematic review evaluated the types of digital psycho-oncology interventions for cancer survivo...

Ilany Nandia Chandra, Mohamad Rusdiansyah, Anya Bunga Fakhriyah et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.