This study aimed to examine the multidimensional nature of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) addiction among undergraduate students. For this purpose, firstly, the Generative Artificial Intelligence Addiction Scale (GAI-AS) was developed and administered to 919 undergraduate students. The GAI-AS was designed as a psychometrically valid instrument to assess addictive patterns of GAI use across four dimensions: salience, excessive dependency, mood modification, and functional impairment. The findings provide strong evidence of the scale's validity and reliability. Subsequently, the validated instrument was administered to 803 undergraduate students to investigate demographic and usage-related differences in GAI addiction tendencies. Findings revealed no significant differences in GAI-AS scores according to gender or type of GAI version used (free vs. paid). Grade-level differences were observed only in the dimension of excessive dependency, with freshman students reporting slightly lower scores than upper-class students. In contrast, frequency of GAI use emerged as a strong and consistent predictor, as daily users showed significantly higher scores across all four dimensions and on the total scale. Correlation analyses further demonstrated moderate positive associations among all GAI-AS sub-dimensions, supporting the conceptualization of GAI addiction as an interconnected behavioral and emotional phenomenon. These findings clarify GAI addiction as a psychological construct and provide a validated scale.
The Chinese version of the Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dependency Scale is a useful assessment tool for determining generative AI dependency among Chinese university students because it shows strong validity, reliability, and measurement invariance.
Yi-Han Deng, Juan Wen, Ai-Lian Pang et al.· Acta Psychologica· 0 citations
Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is increasingly used by school students, yet validated instruments for assessing problematic GAI use (PUGAI) in this population remain scarce. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Problematic Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Scale (PUGAIS) in a large...
Yang Wang, Jia-Min Huang, Deborah Baofeng Wang et al.· Behavioral Science· 0 citations
GenAI use profiles were associated with different levels of depression and anxiety among college students, and person-centered prevention strategies should focus on usage motivation, AI literacy, and dependency rather than frequency alone.
Hao-Yang Shi, Tongyi Zhang, Zi-Hao Wang et al.· Journal of Affective Disorde...· 0 citations
To investigate the mechanisms through which Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) empowers Generation Z college students' learning through human-AI collaboration, this study surveyed undergraduate and postgraduate students born between 1995 and 2009. A questionnaire was administered across four dimensions, includi...
Shu-Hong Li, Jian-Nan Jia, Zhi-Sheng Zhu· Journal of Education and Edu...· 0 citations
Introduction Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has become embedded in higher education, raising concerns about students’ behavioral dependency on these tools. Focusing on pre-service teachers—who will shape how a future generation learns to use AI—we asked how prevalent GenAI dependency is, what drives it, and...
Bing-Qi Jiang, Zhuo Wang· Frontiers in Psychology· 2 citations
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is now widely used by college students, but the mental health implications of different interaction patterns remain unclear. Because GenAI can support task-focused, cognitive, and emotionally salient forms of engagement, engagement quality may be more informative than use inte...
Zong-Ming Liu, Shuai Yang, Ping Fan et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.