Jul 2026· ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security· Vol 29, pp. 1 - 23· 0 citations· 42 references
TL;DR
Experimental results demonstrate that PPGM-GAN outperforms state-of-the-art privacy-preserving generative models, producing high-utility synthetic data under the same privacy constraints.
Abstract
High-quality data are essential for machine learning and data-driven research, yet data scarcity and privacy concerns remain major obstacles in many domains. Generative models have recently emerged as a promising approach to synthesize data that follow the same statistical distribution as real datasets. However, generative models are vulnerable to membership inference attacks, which threaten data confidentiality by exploiting model outputs to infer whether specific samples were used in training. Existing defense strategies struggle to simultaneously preserve data utility and provide robust privacy protection. To address this challenge, we propose our PPGM-GAN, a Privacy-Preserving GAN for synthetic data against membership inference attack to balance both data utility and data privacy. PPGM-GAN balances privacy and utility through a privacy-utility tradeoff function that quantifies and optimizes both aspects under different adversarial knowledge. To enhance data utility, we incorporate conditional generation and key-attribute screening to ensure sufficient representation of infrequent attribute values. Additionally, differential privacy is employed during training to prevent overfitting and reduce privacy leakage. Experimental results demonstrate that PPGM-GAN outperforms state-of-the-art privacy-preserving generative models, producing high-utility synthetic data under the same privacy constraints.
This paper studies embedding-space privacy as a representation-level learning problem. Rather than altering raw records directly, the proposed framework applies embeddingspace transformation to full-record representations through Gaussian perturbation and adversarial representation sanitization. The method is evaluated...
D. Panagoulias, Evangelia-Aikaterini Tsichrintzi, E. Sakkopoulos· International Conference on...· 0 citations
RS-KD is proposed, a defense mechanism that dynamically adapts the distillation process according to a privacy risk score estimated from the output characteristics of a teacher model, allowing the framework to selectively regulate the uncertainty introduced during distillation.
R. Kassa, Kamel Adi, Abdelkamel Tari· International Conference on...· 0 citations
FISGuard reduces the ProjRes attack AUC to near the random-guessing level of 0.5 in most settings, while maintaining downstream task performance close to that of the undefended model and introducing only limited computational overhead, thereby achieving a favorable privacy--utility trade-off.
The analysis finds that noise-based methods such as DP remain the practical baseline but offer only partial protection; cryptographic approaches provide stronger theoretical guarantees at substantially higher cost; and LLM/multimodal leakage remains an urgent, under-benchmarked gap.
Subhasish Ghosh, A. K. Mandal· Knowledge and Information Sy...· 0 citations
This work considers normalized histograms as distribution estimators and characterize the asymptotically optimal domain-aware privacy mechanism within a specific class of DP mechanisms, and introduces PubMix, a public-data-aware DP mechanism that can be used in histogram-based data synthesis pipelines.
Sajani Vithana, Sangwon Jung, Haoyang Hu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
A federated deep learning framework that systematically integrates adaptive privacy noise mechanisms and trust-weighted aggregation within a distributed architecture that ensures the protection of sensitive data during collaborative analysis through precise differential privacy control and advanced neural network model...