Skip to content

FISGuard: Defending Against Membership Inference via Fixed Input Subspaces

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 30 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

FISGuard reduces the ProjRes attack AUC to near the random-guessing level of 0.5 in most settings, while maintaining downstream task performance close to that of the undefended model and introducing only limited computational overhead, thereby achieving a favorable privacy--utility trade-off.

Abstract

As large language models are increasingly adopted in federated learning, protecting user privacy while performing parameter-efficient fine-tuning on distributed private data has become an important challenge. Although clients only share gradients instead of directly uploading raw data, the shared gradients may still leak membership information about training samples. ProjRes (S&P, 2026) further increases this risk: with less information and without accessing model outputs, an attacker can effectively distinguish members from non-members solely based on the projection residual between a candidate representation and the subspace induced by server-observable gradients. Existing defenses against membership inference mostly rely on gradient perturbation or regularization, which can not only degrade model utility but also fail to effectively defend against the membership inference attack introduced by ProjRes, which exploits the geometric structure of gradients. To address this issue, we propose FISGuard, a lightweight defense. Its key idea is to construct and fix a low-dimensional representation subspace using independent public data, thereby restricting the space through which private representations are exposed via gradients while preserving the primary information required for downstream tasks. This substantially reduces the projection-residual discrepancy between members and non-members. We evaluate FISGuard against five representative defense methods across three NLP datasets, two LLMs, and two fine-tuning strategies, Adapter and LoRA. The results show that FISGuard reduces the ProjRes attack AUC to near the random-guessing level of 0.5 in most settings, while maintaining downstream task performance close to that of the undefended model and introducing only limited computational overhead, thereby achieving a favorable privacy--utility trade-off.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

A predictive uncertainty curve framework for membership inference attacks

Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) pose a notable privacy threat by determining whether specific samples were used to train a target model. Existing approaches primarily rely on static model outputs or computationally expensive shadow models, neglecting the dynamic stability of predictions under input perturbations. W...

Shu-Wen-Hu-Bei Liu, Yun-Hua He, Zhi-Hao Zhou et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

SoK: Privacy Attacks on Machine Learning via Explainable AI

It is argued that explanation privacy should be evaluated as an end-to-end disclosure problem, with defenses matched to the acquisition path and protected asset, with defenses matched to the acquisition path and protected asset.

A. Oksuz, Anisa Halimi, Erman Ayday · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

Sleeping Secrets: How Fine-Tuning Reawakens Privacy Risks in Language Models

Beyond adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to specialized applications, fine-tuning has recently been shown to recover private information that is no longer accessible through direct queries. Previous fine-tuning recovery attacks, however, require genuine private supervision drawn from the same distribution, i.e., th...

Jian-Hong Li, Jia-Hao Chen, Yuwen Pu et al. · 0 citations
2026

PI-SAFE: Practical Privacy-Preserving LLM Inference With Adversarial Fine-Tuning for Optimized Utility

Cloud-based Large Language Model (LLM) inference services typically require users to submit plain-text inputs, thereby posing severe privacy risks. Existing privacy-preserving paradigms are mostly task-specific and often necessitate pervasive modifications to the entire server-side model. This reliance introduces subst...

Wentao Zhong, Yu-Ting Li, Di-Cong Yu et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Adaptive Diffusion Freezing: Privacy-preserving Diffusion Models Against Membership Inference Attacks

A novel framework of privacy-preserving diffusion models, Adaptive Diffusion Freezing (ADF), which can defend against MIAs with better trade-off, and introduces a pretraining-based risk-aware freezing policy to estimate MIA risk based on memorization tendency.

Jia-Lu Guo, Xiao Han, Jun-Jie Wu · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

A Sharp Transition in Data Reconstruction under Differential Privacy

This work studies informed attackers who aim to reconstruct a single $d$-dimensional training sample from a $\rho$-zero-concentrated DP model, knowing all other training data, and derives entropy-based lower bounds for any private mechanism and any attack, demonstrating that the privacy budget guaranteeing adequate pro...

Max Cairney-Leeming, Simone Bombari, Marco Mondelli · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.