Skip to content
Review Open access

Dynamic phenotype monitoring to prevent genotype–phenotype discrepancies in pharmacogenetic-guided drug therapy

Jul 2026 · Frontiers in Pharmacology · Vol 17 · 0 citations · 66 references
Medicine

TL;DR

An integrated analysis of routine (CRP, transaminases), functional, and molecular biomarkers offers a novel strategy for interpreting clinically significant genotype–phenotype discordance and anticipate potential variations in drug exposure tolerance.

Abstract

Background One of the limiting factors for the clinical application of pharmacogenomics (PGx) is phenoconversion, i.e., the dynamic discrepancy between genotype-predicted and actual drug-metabolizing phenotypes. Systemic inflammation, polypharmacy, transporter dysfunction, redox and mitochondrial stress, and epigenetic modification can rapidly alter cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme and transporter activity. This suppression can lead to unexpected poor metabolizing phenotypes, increased drug accumulation, and even an increased risk of drug-induced liver injury. Therefore, static PGx genotyping should be complemented by real-time functional biomarker monitoring to achieve more accurate, effective, and safe drug delivery. Methods This structured narrative review integrates a systematic literature search with expert-guided thematic synthesis. Mechanistic insights are supported by selectively included preclinical data. Candidate biomarkers—including miR-122, 4β-hydroxycholesterol, and GLDH—were identified through an iterative, criteria-based selection process that prioritizes mechanistic plausibility, clinical relevance, and favorable kinetics. Results Mechanistic analyses have implicated cytokine-mediated signaling pathways (IL-6/STAT3, NF-κB), nuclear receptor repression (PXR/CAR), proteasomal CYP degradation, miRNA-driven mRNA destabilization, and enzyme inactivation as causes of phenoconversion. Dysfunction of the transporters OATP, BSEP, and MRP2, particularly in SLCO and ABCC genetic variants, creates a dual intrahepatic bottleneck that exacerbates drug and metabolite accumulation. The biomarker matrix, which collectively considers 4β-hydroxycholesterol, miR-122, GLDH, M30, sCD163, and acute phase reactants (CRP/IL-6), provides a theoretical framework to explore early hepatocellular stress secondary to inflammation-mediated CYP suppression and phenoconversion, thereby serving as an investigative tool to model genotype–phenotype discordance and anticipate potential variations in drug exposure tolerance. Conclusion Within this hypothesis-generating framework, an integrated analysis of routine (CRP, transaminases), functional, and molecular biomarkers offers a novel strategy for interpreting clinically significant genotype–phenotype discordance. This approach shows the functional consequences of altered CYP activity rather than genetic predictions. Combining these multi-level parameters systematically reflects the main mechanistic domains: systemic inflammation-induced phenoconversion (CRP, IL-6), mitochondrial and oxidative stress (AST/ALT ratio, GLDH), early hepatocyte stress and apoptosis (miR-122, M30), and actual CYP3A4 metabolic capacity (4β-OHC). A PGx panel integrated with a dynamic biomarker could lead to safer, more effective, and adaptive drug dosing and reduced liver injury for high-risk patients.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

Pharmacogenomic biomarkers in oncology: evidence, clinical utility, and barriers to implementation.

Interpatient variability in chemotherapy response and toxicity remains a major challenge in oncology. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is an approach to address this challenge by combining somatic alterations that affect tumour sensitivity with germline variants that affect drug metabolism, transport and toxicity. This review provides a critical evaluation of clinically validated PGx biomarkers for chemotherapeutics and targeted therapy with a focus on translational relevance and strength of evidence. High-impact germline markers such as DPYD, TPMT, NUDT15 and UGT1A1 are highlighted as key determinants of genotype-guided dosing for improving safety without compromising efficacy. Somatic biomarkers such as EGFR, RAS, BRAF, and HER2 remain central to treatment selection, while resistance underscores the need for ongoing molecular assessment. A tiered implementation framework, barriers to progress, and future directions involving polygenic models, multi-omics, and artificial intelligence (AI) are discussed to advance safe, effective, and personalized chemotherapy.

Satyam Kumar Vishwash, Ram Babu Soni, Sourabh Kosey et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Pharmacogenomics of Adverse Drug Reactions: Integrating Genetic Biomarkers into Precision Pharmacotherapy

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) remain a major global healthcare challenge, accounting for significant morbidity, mortality, treatment failure, and increased healthcare expenditure. Although clinical factors such as age, comorbidities, organ function, and polypharmacy contribute to ADR susceptibility, they inadequately explain the marked interindividual variability in drug response. Pharmacogenomics has emerged as a transformative approach to precision medicine by identifying inherited genetic variants that influence drug metabolism, transport, efficacy, and toxicity. This review critically examines the role of pharmacogenomic testing in predicting, preventing, and managing ADRs, with emphasis on clinically actionable pharmacogenes including CYP2D6, CYP2C19, TPMT, NUDT15, HLA-B15:02, HLA-B57:01, and HLA-B 58:01. Evidence from international pharmacogenomic guidelines demonstrates that genotype-guided prescribing significantly reduces severe hypersensitivity reactions, drug toxicity, and treatment failure while improving therapeutic efficacy and patient safety. The review further discusses current clinical applications, implementation challenges, ethical considerations, and emerging advances in genomic technologies, artificial intelligence, and clinical decision-support systems. The integration of pharmacogenomics into routine healthcare has the potential to optimize individualized drug therapy, minimize preventable ADRs, and accelerate the transition toward precision medicine, ultimately improving clinical outcomes and healthcare quality.

Rayapudi Vasavi Sai Saraswati, U. M. Vattikuti, Arthika Chauhan Laudia et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Clinical Implications of UGT1A1 Polymorphisms in Anticancer Therapy: An Updated Review

Pharmacogenetics has transformed oncology by enabling personalized, effective and safer use of anticancer therapies. Among clinically relevant pharmacogenetic biomarkers, polymorphisms in the UGT1A1 gene influence the metabolism of irinotecan and other SN-38-based agents, increasing the risk of treatment-related toxicities. Beyond SN-38-based therapies, UGT1A1 contributes to the metabolism of endogenous compounds and several drugs, and its activity may be affected by concomitant inhibitors or inducers, highlighting its broader clinical relevance. Although substantial evidence supports the association between UGT1A1 genotype and drug safety, implementation of genotype-guided treatment remains inconsistent. This narrative review summarizes the biological basis and clinical relevance of UGT1A1 polymorphisms in patients receiving SN-38-based therapies. Original studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and international and regional pharmacogenetic guidelines were evaluated regarding genotype-guided dosing, clinical outcomes, implementation strategies, and barriers to routine testing. Reduced-function UGT1A1 variants are associated with increased risk of irinotecan-induced neutropenia and diarrhea, particularly at higher doses. However, recommendations from scientific societies differ regarding testing indications, dose adjustment strategies, and patient selection. Uncertainties remain concerning the clinical implications of UGT1A1 variability for newer antibody–drug conjugates carrying an SN-38 payload. Practical barriers, including inconsistent guideline recommendations, limited access to testing, reimbursement issues, and heterogeneous clinical workflows, continue to restrict implementation. UGT1A1 genotyping represents a valuable tool for improving the safety of selected anticancer therapies, yet its incorporation into clinical practice remains incomplete. As precision oncology evolves, pharmacogenetic testing may optimize treatment selection, reduce toxicity, and improve outcomes. Further harmonization of international recommendations, high-quality prospective studies, and wider access to pharmacogenetic testing are needed to support routine implementation.

S. Vitale, Melissa Drago, F. Martorana et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Pharmacogenomics and Precision Pharmacotherapy in Heart Failure: A Narrative Review

Heart failure is a life-threatening condition affecting approximately 1% of the global population, with its prevalence continuing to rise. Genetic factors, including pathogenic variants in sarcomere, cytoskeletal, and ion channel genes, contribute to disease progression, often following Mendelian inheritance patterns. However, most interindividual variability in disease course and therapeutic response arises from polygenic, non Mendelian patterns, particularly single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). SNPs can modestly influence gene expression, protein function, and downstream signaling pathways, thereby affecting the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cardiovascular drugs. Variants in genes such as CYP2D6, ACE, AGT, CYP11B2, ADRB1/2, SLC5A2, and UGT2B4 have been associated with differential responses to β-blockers, SGLT2-inhibitors, and ACE inhibitors. The clinical application of genomic approaches remains limited due to small study sizes, interpatient variability, and the lack of standardized biomarkers. Nevertheless, integrating genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic data offers a promising strategy to guide more effective and individualized heart failure pharmacotherapy.

Andika Yusuf Ramadhan · 0 citations
Review Open access Jan 2026

Metabolomics and Precision Medicine in Resistant Hypertension: Pathophysiological Insights, Biomarker Discovery, and Translational Strategies

Resistant hypertension (RH), defined as uncontrolled blood pressure despite the use of at least three optimally dosed antihypertensive agents, including a diuretic, remains a major clinical challenge associated with elevated cardiovascular risk. Metabolomics offers a dynamic approach to characterize biochemical perturbations related to amino acid metabolism, lipid remodeling, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, renal impairment, and gut microbiota–derived metabolites. However, current evidence remains limited by small sample sizes, cross‐sectional designs, heterogeneous definitions of RH, inadequate exclusion of pseudoresistance, medication confounding, and limited external validation. This structured narrative review synthesizes RH‐specific metabolomic evidence and distinguishes it from findings extrapolated from broader hypertension populations. We further discuss methodological challenges, replication gaps, pharmacometabolomic confounding, and validation standards required for clinical implementation. Integrating metabolomics with clinical phenotyping, genomics, proteomics, and microbiome profiling may eventually support RH phenotyping, treatment–response prediction, and biomarker‐guided precision medicine, but large longitudinal cohorts with confirmed true RH are needed before clinical translation.

Y. Lee, Miri Park, Yoon Shin Cho et al. · 0 citations