Apr 2026· CognitivaTech: Ingenieria de Software Inteligente y Sistemas Adaptativos· Vol 3, pp. 53· 0 citations· 22 references
TL;DR
Evaluating the effectiveness of AI- and ML-assisted software test automation versus a conventional approach in Software Technology Engineering students at the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico found the experimental group reduced the mean resolution time and detected a greater number of defects.
Abstract
Introduction: Software test automation is an essential strategy to reduce times, improve coverage and detect defects during development. The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) opens up new possibilities for generating, prioritizing, and optimizing test cases. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of AI- and ML-assisted software test automation versus a conventional approach in Software Technology Engineering students at the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico. Methodology: A quantitative, applied, experimental, prospective and comparative study was carried out with 128 students, randomly distributed into a control group (n=64) and an experimental group (n=64). Execution time, compilable and executable tests, coverage of lines and branches, mutation score and detected defects were evaluated. Results: The experimental group reduced the mean resolution time from 44.8 to 36.2 minutes and obtained higher values of line coverage (82.6 % vs. 74.8 %), branch coverage (75.4 % vs. 66.1 %) and mutation score (70.8 % vs. 59.7 %). It also detected a greater number of defects, with statistically significant differences (p
This study offers an AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification that maximizes test case creation, defect detection, and execution speed and hybrid AI models perform better than solo techniques in terms of fault discovery, testing effectiveness, and verification accuracy.
D. Natarajan· Journal of Science & Technol...· 10 citations· ⚡1
The analysis indicates that combining predictive defect-risk scores with automated test selection can potentially reduce redundant testing, concentrate computational resources on high-risk software components, and improve feedback speed, but model reliability depends on historical defect data, feature quality, distribu...
Haruto Tanaka, Yuki Nakamura· Frontiers in Emerging Multid...· 0 citations
It is argued that AI is unlikely to fully replace human testers in the near future and should be used as an assistant that supports human judgment in software quality assurance.
In order to enhance the caliber, applicability, and maintainability of automated tests, the study investigates the incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches into the Test-Driven Development (TDD) methodology. The time needed for manual test design, the challenge of finding non-trivial edge situations, an...
Vladyslav Pechenenko, O. Grinenko· ВИМІРЮВАЛЬНА ТА ОБЧИСЛЮВАЛЬН...· 0 citations
It is concluded that AI-enabled test automation can improve testing efficiency and adaptability when learning mechanisms are combined with controlled validation, risk-based decision criteria, and human oversight.
N. Gunasekara, Tharushi Senanayake· The American Journal of Inte...· 0 citations
This paper focuses on two key tasks—AI-driven test case generation and defect detection—and provides a systematic review of the technological evolution from traditional automation to intelligent testing, contrasting traditional deep learning and large language model approaches in defect detection.
Jia-Lei Chen· Applied and Computational En...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.