It is concluded that differences in 3Di characters between semaphoronts are not intrinsically a problem, but they do require that the researcher uses the same replicable method on all proteins in the phylogenetic analysis.
Abstract
Abstract Protein structure characters have great potential for improving phylogenetic inference, especially for deep nodes where amino acid sequences are highly diverged. The combination of AlphaFold structure predictions and Foldseek's “3Di” structural alphabet makes it relatively easy to conduct model-based phylogenetic inference that includes a partition of slow-evolving 3Di characters. However, we show that even identical amino acid sequences can produce substantially different 3Di characters, depending on the source of the structural model and whether inter-chain interactions are considered. We argue that such variability can be addressed with key concepts from traditional organism-based phylogenetic systematics: semaphoront, hypodigm, and character ascertainment method. To illustrate this, we develop an analogy between organismal development, taphonomy, and subsequent description and character coding by a systematist, and the process of protein synthesis, folding, and interaction and subsequent extraction, experimentation, and structural modeling by a biochemist. We conclude that differences in 3Di characters between semaphoronts are not intrinsically a problem, but they do require that the researcher uses the same replicable method on all proteins in the phylogenetic analysis. The guiding principle should be to maximize the chance that character differences in the data matrix are the results of underlying evolutionary changes, rather than artifacts due to differences in the methods used for obtaining semaphoronts and coding characters.
PRIME (PRoperty Informed Models of Evolution), a framework of codon-level maximum likelihood methods that explicitly model amino acid exchangeability as a function of physicochemical properties, provides a useful framework for characterizing the mechanistic drivers of protein diversity.
Hannah Kim, Konrad Scheffler, Anton Nekrutenko et al.· Molecular biology and evolut...· 0 citations
This work decomposes canonical proteins, intergenic sequences, and recently emerged yeast and fly de novo proteins, together with randomized controls, into short, interpretable fragments (k-mers) and compares them using alignment-free distances.
Lars A. Eicholt, Á. Tóth-Petróczy, R. Goldstein et al.· bioRxiv· 1 citation
This chapter serves as a user-friendly practical tutorial for conducting structural phylogenetic analyses using accessible and computationally efficient tools, using synaptotagmins-calcium-sensing proteins essential for synaptic vesicle fusion-as a running example.
Caroline Puente-Lelievre, Nicholas J. Matzke, J. Douglas· Methods in molecular biology· 0 citations
The results support Ladderpath as an alignment-free, structurally informed method that could complement standard pipelines in cases where higher-order sequence structure carries phylogenetic signal.
Zhu Zhang, Jie-Yu Wang, Fengyao Zhai et al.· 0 citations
4MRNA is anticipated to become an indispensable tool for nucleic acid structure determination, profoundly advancing fundamental research and extending its impact to wide-ranging applications including structure-based drug design and nucleic acid nanotechnology.
Shin Ando, Jiro Kondo· RNA: A publication of the RN...· 0 citations
A broad computational investigation of genetic and protein novelty throughout the entire subphylum of Saccharomycotina yeasts shows that “invention” of new folds occurs more frequently through de novo emergence, and illustrates cases of evolutionary “re-invention” of existing protein folds from noncoding sequences.
Emilios Tassios, Nikolaos Pirgelis, D. Rinker et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.