Skip to content
Open access

Stages of objective memory impairment (SOMI) as a predictor of clinical progression in the A4 study

Aug 2026 · The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · Vol 13, pp. 100641 · 0 citations · 41 references
Medicine

TL;DR

SOMI’s risk profile in A4 was similar to prior findings in observational cohorts, and provides a low-cost, non-invasive enrichment tool for identifying individuals at risk for early cognitive decline in secondary prevention trials.

Abstract

Background About one third of amyloid positive, cognitively normal individuals develop mild cognitive impairment or clinical Alzheimer dementia (AD) over 5 years of follow-up. Sensitive cognitive measures, in addition to biomarkers of amyloid pathology, add to the efficiency of secondary prevention trials by identifying cognitively normal individuals at greatest risk of clinical progression. The Stages of Objective Memory Impairment (SOMI) system, based on the picture version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with immediate recall (pFCSRT+IR), predicted clinical progression in two observational studies. Objective Our objective was to extend SOMI’s findings to clinical trials using participants from the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s(A4) study. Methods Eligible participants were cognitively normal, had a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) =0, an elevated amyloid level, the pFCSRT+IR, pTau217, and longitudinal data on the CDR. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of baseline SOMI stage for clinical progression defined by time to the first of 2 consecutive CDRs > 0 or CDR>0 at last assessment. The sample was censored at 4.5 years of follow-up. Results Of the 911 eligible participants, mean age was 72 years, 59% were female, 62% were APOE ε4 carriers, and 37% progressed over 4.5 years. Hazard ratios (HR) for progression were estimated with follow-up time as the timescale and the SOMI 0 group as the reference. The HRs for progression across SOMI stage increased from 1.48(1.15–1.92 p=.003) for SOMI-1, to 1.83 (1.32–2.54, p ≤ 0.001) for SOMI-2, and to 3.04 (1.97–4.68, p ≤ 0.001) for SOMI 3/4. SOMI remained an independent and significant predictor when pTau217 was added to the model. Conclusion SOMI’s risk profile in A4 was similar to prior findings in observational cohorts. SOMI provides a low-cost, non-invasive enrichment tool for identifying individuals at risk for early cognitive decline in secondary prevention trials.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Comparative Value of Cognitive and Functional Assessments for Predicting 24-Month Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer’s Disease: An ADNI Cohort Study

Episodic memory demonstrated the strongest predictive performance among the individual assessment domains evaluated of 24-month progression from MCI to AD, with functional assessment providing substantial complementary value.

Sophie Choe · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Recognition memory as a neuropsychological marker of progression in early-stage Alzheimer's disease: a 24-month prospective cohort study.

SDT-derived recognition indices, especially d'prime, provide clinically relevant prognostic information in a-MCI and adding d' to delayed recall and biomarkers may improve risk stratification, follow-up planning, and selection for disease-modifying trials.

María Julieta Russo, José Bueri, L. Alba-Ferrara et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Temporal order of clinical symptoms in Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND Understanding the temporal order of clinical symptoms is critical for improving disease progression assessment in biomarker-defined Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the sequential emergence of cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and functional manifestations remains incompletely characterized. The purpose of this...

Ming-Qing Wei, Junlei Zhang, Jing Shi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Predictive value of the Alzheimer polygenic risk score on cognitive decline in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia

Although polygenic burden contributes to variability in cognitive trajectories, its added predictive value beyond routinely available clinical variables remains modest.

B. Calm, Adrián Hinojosa-Calleja, F. García-Gutiérrez et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.