Skip to content
#explainable ai Open access

An interpretable and adaptive AI governance framework

Sep 2026 · Data & Policy · Vol 8 · 0 citations · 60 references

TL;DR

This study proposes an explainable and adaptive AI governance approach from the perspective of time to balance AI governance and AI innovation.

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence has raised a series of ethical issues. How to balance AI innovation and AI governance has attracted wide attention from society. Some principle-based and practical approaches have already emerged. However, these strategies mainly face problems of time, speed, and cost. They fail to fundamentally balance dynamic factors and the need for explainability. This study proposes an explainable and adaptive AI governance approach from the perspective of time to balance AI governance and AI innovation. Causal models have causal explanation capabilities. They meet the requirements of responsible innovation. They can improve governance speed and reduce governance and innovation costs. Taking Bayesian networks as an example, they have explainability and dynamic adaptation ability. Bayesian networks can be used as a governance step before a regulatory sandbox. Bayesian networks can implement a human-assisted regulatory approach. This approach can combine the EU Artificial Intelligence Act with scholars’ recommendations on quantifiable risk levels. The explainable and adaptive AI governance approach has three important meanings for AI governance. First, it can provide an inclusive governance path. Second, it can supplement static governance strategies. Third, it can automatically generate explainable value alignment schemes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#explainable ai Sep 2026

How Artificial Intelligence Facilitates Collaborative Governance? Research on Mechanisms and Multi‐Dimensional Effects Based on Triple Entities

A quantifiable multi‐stakeholder governance framework and actionable policy insights for China and the Global South are offered and econometric evidence from difference‐in‐differences, threshold regressions, and spatial econometric models robustly addresses concerns about AI.

Zhuo-Cheng Lu, Fei Fan, Zhen-Nan Yang et al. · 0 citations
#large language models Review Open access Sep 2026

Systemic Risks and Governance of Advanced Artificial Intelligence: A Structured Literature Review

A synthesized six-risk taxonomy; a four-level governance model spanning the individual, developer, state, and international levels; and a critical appraisal of the evidentiary basis for each risk claim suggest that dangerous outcomes are structurally plausible, though not inevitable, and that coordinated multilevel gov...

Joey O. Chua, E. Ayo, Josan D. Tamayo et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence and Climate Risk Shocks.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely applied across various fields and has demonstrated effectiveness to some extent. However, some scholars have raised concerns about its ethical implications and potential rebound effects, particularly in the context of climate issues. To address these debates, we obtained cro...

Peng-Yu Chen, Zhong-Zhu Chu, Sarula Bai et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI Governance Engineering: A Framework for Secure, Explainable, and Trustworthy Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Systems

This paper argues for a transition from AI Governance as Compliance to AI Governance Engineering , a systems-oriented discipline in which governance is embedded throughout the enterprise intelligence lifecycle, enabling enterprise intelligence systems that are secure, explainable, trustworthy, and governable by design.

Faruk Çelikkanat · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

From AI to Posthumanism via ISO 42001 and AI Governance Standards

The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) into legal and compliance functions — from rule-based transaction monitoring to reinforcement-learning-aligned large language models (LLMs) capable of near-autonomous decision-making — necessitates governance frameworks adequate to the technology's operational reality...

Teresa Hau-Man Chan, Samuel Kwong-Ming Ho · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Governing Artificial Intelligence in a Fragmented World: Toward a Multi-Level Policy Framework for Global AI Governance

It is argued that a layered subsidiarity approach, with specific financing for capacity-building and technical standards that work across the board, is more likely to deliver effective global AI governance than calls for a binding treaty.

Asher Odhiambo Ojuok, Julius Murumba, E. Micheni · 0 citations

Related blog posts

GPT-Lab Oct 14, 2026

Building trustworthy AI: The role of AI harnesses, intent contracts and evals

AI is moving beyond impressive demos. After World Summit AI 2026 in Amsterdam, GPT-Lab's Muhammad Waseem reflects on what organizations need to make AI agents reliable, responsible and genuinely useful in everyday work. The post Building trustworthy AI: The role of AI harnesses, intent contracts and evals appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.