This study proposes an explainable and adaptive AI governance approach from the perspective of time to balance AI governance and AI innovation.
Abstract
Abstract In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence has raised a series of ethical issues. How to balance AI innovation and AI governance has attracted wide attention from society. Some principle-based and practical approaches have already emerged. However, these strategies mainly face problems of time, speed, and cost. They fail to fundamentally balance dynamic factors and the need for explainability. This study proposes an explainable and adaptive AI governance approach from the perspective of time to balance AI governance and AI innovation. Causal models have causal explanation capabilities. They meet the requirements of responsible innovation. They can improve governance speed and reduce governance and innovation costs. Taking Bayesian networks as an example, they have explainability and dynamic adaptation ability. Bayesian networks can be used as a governance step before a regulatory sandbox. Bayesian networks can implement a human-assisted regulatory approach. This approach can combine the EU Artificial Intelligence Act with scholars’ recommendations on quantifiable risk levels. The explainable and adaptive AI governance approach has three important meanings for AI governance. First, it can provide an inclusive governance path. Second, it can supplement static governance strategies. Third, it can automatically generate explainable value alignment schemes.
A quantifiable multi‐stakeholder governance framework and actionable policy insights for China and the Global South are offered and econometric evidence from difference‐in‐differences, threshold regressions, and spatial econometric models robustly addresses concerns about AI.
Zhuo-Cheng Lu, Fei Fan, Zhen-Nan Yang et al.· Public Administration· 0 citations
A synthesized six-risk taxonomy; a four-level governance model spanning the individual, developer, state, and international levels; and a critical appraisal of the evidentiary basis for each risk claim suggest that dangerous outcomes are structurally plausible, though not inevitable, and that coordinated multilevel gov...
Joey O. Chua, E. Ayo, Josan D. Tamayo et al.· GEO Academic Journal· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely applied across various fields and has demonstrated effectiveness to some extent. However, some scholars have raised concerns about its ethical implications and potential rebound effects, particularly in the context of climate issues. To address these debates, we obtained cro...
Peng-Yu Chen, Zhong-Zhu Chu, Sarula Bai et al.· Risk Analysis· 0 citations
This paper argues for a transition from AI Governance as Compliance to AI Governance Engineering , a systems-oriented discipline in which governance is embedded throughout the enterprise intelligence lifecycle, enabling enterprise intelligence systems that are secure, explainable, trustworthy, and governable by design.
Faruk Çelikkanat· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) into legal and compliance functions — from rule-based transaction monitoring to reinforcement-learning-aligned large language models (LLMs) capable of near-autonomous decision-making — necessitates governance frameworks adequate to the technology's operational reality...
Teresa Hau-Man Chan, Samuel Kwong-Ming Ho· Journal of Posthumanism· 0 citations
It is argued that a layered subsidiarity approach, with specific financing for capacity-building and technical standards that work across the board, is more likely to deliver effective global AI governance than calls for a binding treaty.
Asher Odhiambo Ojuok, Julius Murumba, E. Micheni· East African Journal of Info...· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 15, 2026
AI is moving beyond impressive demos. After World Summit AI 2026 in Amsterdam, GPT-Lab's Muhammad Waseem reflects on what organizations need to make AI agents reliable, responsible and genuinely useful in everyday work. The post Building trustworthy AI: The role of AI harnesses, intent contracts and evals appeared first on GPT-Lab.
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.