Skip to content
Conference

Reliability-Aware Client Selection in Asynchronous and Heterogeneous Federated Learning

Jul 2026 · International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud · pp. 273-278 · 0 citations · 16 references

Abstract

Polaris is a client selection framework for asynchronous and heterogeneous federated learning that employs quality-aware sampling to accelerate convergence. Its reliance on scalar update norms as quality indicators exposes it to exploitation, in which clients submit near-zero Gaussian updates that inflate the update magnitude proxy within the Polaris sampling objective without contributing meaningful gradient information. This work introduces a lightweight reliability-aware extension that embeds two server-side signals, Exponential Moving Average (EMA)-based magnitude credibility and cosine similarity-based directional alignment, directly into the staleness and aggregation weight proxy computation without modifying the geometric programming objective or aggregation semantics. Experiments across ResNet-18 on CIFAR-10, LeNet-5 on FEMNIST, and LeNet-5 on MNIST under non-IID data distributions confirm that attack effectiveness and defense discrimination are governed by task complexity and non-IID (non-Independent and Identically Distributed) degree. The proposed method demonstrates partial resistance to convergence collapse at lower adversarial ratios while introducing only a marginal accuracy overhead under clean conditions.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Open access Sep 2026

DASFL: Dynamic Adaptive Split Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Clients

Split Federated Learning (SFL) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm for privacy-preserving distributed training on resource-constrained edge devices by partitioning neural networks between clients and a server. A critical design choice in SFL is the split layer, which determines the computation distribution and the semant...

Ai-Jing Li, Ya-Wen Li, Guan-Hua Ye et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

URP-FL: Robust and Personalized Federated Learning under Heterogeneous and Adversarial Conditions

Federated learning is appealing for privacy-sensitive network systems, yet its practical deployment remains hindered by the following three recurring challenges: (1) client drift under non-IID data, (2) vulnerability to corrupted updates, and (3) the communication cost of repeated model exchange. Most existing approach...

Hua Kun, Wei Wang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Trust-Aware Topology Learning for Dynamic Decentralized Federated Learning under Adversaries

DMTT (Dynamic MURMURA with Trusted Topology), a decentralized personalized FL protocol built on MURMURA, which uses evidential deep learning to down-weight distribution-mismatched peers, extended here to time-varying graphs under topology-manipulation attacks.

Shubham Vaishnav, Murtaza Rangwala, Ali Beikmohammadi et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

Bypassing Krum: Selection-Aware Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning

The Krum-Proxy attack is introduced, a selection-aware backdoor injection strategy that consistently bypasses Byzantine-robust aggregation and constructs adversarial updates that are not only similar to benign updates but are also optimized to lie in regions of the update space that are favored during aggregation.

Srinivasan Subramanian, Md Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan, K. A. Islam · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Straggler-Aware Asynchronous Federated Learning via Temporal Cost Clustering for Fair and Efficient Heterogeneous Model Training

Heterogeneous federated learning leads to system and data differentials that cause stragglers to either be a bottleneck to synchronous optimization or create representation bias in asynchronous contexts. Although current approaches deal with staleness or buffering independently, their approach does not ensure fast clie...

S. Babalola · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Aggregate-Only Observability for Privacy–Utility Tradeoffs in Federated Learning

Federated Learning (FL) avoids centralizing raw data, but server-side access to per-client updates still creates a significant privacy risk because gradients can leak sensitive information through inversion and related attacks. A common defense is client-level Differential Privacy (DP), which reduces attack fidelity by...

Clifford N. Jones, Md Nahid Hasan, S. Wagle et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.