Experiments on controlled function-learning tasks show that the Masked Pair Encoder can achieve performance comparable to GPT-2-style causal Transformers, suggesting that ICL behavior is not specific to causal language models.
Abstract
In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a central capability of pretrained language models, yet its theoretical analysis has focused primarily on causal language models trained by left-to-right autoregressive prediction, such as GPT-style models. Masked language models instead recover masked tokens from bidirectional context, and their role in ICL remains less understood. We develop a statistical learning framework that represents the context examples by their empirical measure and models prediction as a function of the context and the query. This formulation places autoregressive and masked pretraining objectives within a common excess-risk analysis. Under Wasserstein-type regularity conditions, we relate pretraining with T tasks and N samples per task to k-shot excess risk at inference, obtaining same-order upper bounds for masked and autoregressive objectives. We also study task-distribution shift, where pretraining tasks are sampled from P and inference tasks from Q; the resulting bound contains an additional term controlled by the lifted Wasserstein distance between P and Q. The bounds further imply an order-optimal allocation under a fixed pretraining data budget and refined rates under intrinsic low-dimensional structure. Experiments on controlled function-learning tasks show that the Masked Pair Encoder (MPE) can achieve performance comparable to GPT-2-style causal Transformers, suggesting that ICL behavior is not specific to causal language models.
This work studies how diffusion language models implement induction, a mechanism behind in-context learning in which the model finds a repeated context and copies the token that followed it, and compares attention-only AR models and absorbing-mask DLMs with matched architectures.
Andy Catruna, Emilian Radoi· arXiv.org· 0 citations
The results demonstrate that suppressing entity-linked supervision during pretraining induces a shift in epistemic behavior: KLLMs rely less on parametric knowledge and more on external evidence, leading to improved reliability under realistic conditions, suggesting that pretraining-time control over knowledge acquisit...
Roi Cohen, Yvan Carr'e, Nick Lechtenborger et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Although performance of language-based models is improved by scaling, whether the gap to a structure-aware architecture can eventually be eliminated remains untested.
It is proposed that a model's uncertainty about a token is reflected not only in the breadth of its output distribution but also in whether a confident prediction is \emph{fragile} under perturbation of its attention pathways, a training-free estimator that masks attention heads and measures the BALD mutual information...
Minsoo Kim, Sungyoung Ji, Kisung Moon et al.· 0 citations
It is shown that score-conditioned In-Context Learning (ICL) admits a structural correspondence to policy gradient optimization, and an exact upper bound on the distribution shift induced by a bounded attention update is derived, yielding a trust-region-like analogy to KL-constrained policy optimization.
A domain-conditional position offset is shown to improve retrieval reranking and domain classification when decisions depend on early in-domain tokens, and to be a lightweight, hot switchable tool for short in-domain scoring and calibration.
Ye Qiao· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.