Beyond the Raw Waveform: Fusing Visual Representations of EDA for Stress Detection
TL;DR
The results show that alternative visual forms of the same EDA signal can provide useful inductive biases for stress detection, and that a compact selection of complementary representations can be more effective than the raw waveform alone.
Abstract
Electrodermal activity (EDA) is widely used in automatic stress detection, yet most pipelines treat it only as a raw one-dimensional waveform. This study examines whether complementary visual representations of EDA provide useful information for stress classification and whether their fusion im- proves recognition performance. Six image-based representations are derived from each EDA recording: an unwrapped short-time Fourier transform (STFT) phase spectrogram, an instantaneous-frequency map computed from that phase, a power spectral density (PSD) spectrogram, a continuous wavelet transform scalogram, a recurrence plot, and a rendered waveform trace. The selected representations are stacked as channels of a single multichannel input, together with the raw waveform, and processed by a shared asymmetric-attention architecture. Experiments on a 58-subject stress dataset show that representation fusion improves over the raw waveform. The best configuration, which combines five representations while excluding the unwrapped phase spectrogram, reaches 70.97% test accuracy, compared with 67.36% for the raw waveform. The single PSD spectrogram achieves 69.44%, remaining close to the best-fused configuration at a lower computational cost. The results show that alternative visual forms of the same EDA signal can provide useful inductive biases for stress detection, and that a compact selection of complementary representations can be more effective than the raw waveform alone.