Feb 2026· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2602.13860· 0 citations· 8 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This research navigates three interconnected threads: domain adaptation to ensure technical precision, ethical rigor to mitigate adversarial vulnerabilities, and cultural/multilingual alignment to promote global inclusivity.
Abstract
The overarching research direction of this work is the development of a''Responsible Intelligence''framework designed to reconcile the immense generative power of Large Language Models (LLMs) with the stringent requirements of real-world deployment. As these models become a transformative force in artificial intelligence, there is an urgent need to move beyond general-purpose architectures toward systems that are contextually aware, inherently safer, and deeply respectful of global cultural nuances. This research navigates three interconnected threads: domain adaptation to ensure technical precision, ethical rigor to mitigate adversarial vulnerabilities, and cultural/multilingual alignment to promote global inclusivity. The methodological trajectory moves from classical supervised adaptation for task-specific demands to decoding-time alignment for safety, finally leveraging human feedback and preference modeling to achieve sociolinguistic acuity.
Large language models (LLMs) are capable of completing a variety of tasks, but remain unpredictable and intractable. Representation Control (RepControl) seeks to resolve this problem through targeted interventions that modify high-level representations of concepts such as honesty, harmfulness or power-seeking. We forma...
This Perspective introduces a three-pillar framework for ESE-LLMs: domain perception, knowledge grounding, and action capability, and presents a decision-guided deployment workflow that helps researchers in ESE fields integrate LLMs into their workflow.
Jin-Yue Jiang, Jun-Jie Zhu, Z. Ren· Environmental Science and Te...· 1 citation
As AI systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, regulatory and societal demands for transparency and interpretability continue to grow. While classical Explainable AI (XAI) methods produce structured technical artifacts (e.g., feature attributions and counterfactual examples), these remain difficult to...
Gabriele Tolomei, Zi-Heng Chen, Flavio Giorgi et al.· Proceedings of the 35th ACM...· 0 citations
Large language models have enabled rapid deployment of language classification and analysis, allowing users to describe complex constructs in natural language, such as pedagogical moves or expressions of learning and engagement, and label them in conversational datasets such as classroom or tutoring transcripts. Howeve...
Julian Bernado, Ana T. Ribeiro, Xander Beberman et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Over recent decades, AI’s rapid development has been matched by shifts in its specialized vocabulary. The
terminological unit
AI Agent
has become central to how systems are described, built, and regulated, yet research
is split. Technical histories track capabilities but neglect linguistic construction, while t...
Qi-Feng Gong· Terminology. International J...· 7 citations
Large Language Models (LLMs) treat all context tokens uniformly, lacking explicit separation between executable instructions and passive data. This leads to prompt injection vulnerabilities, ambiguous instruction binding, and unreliable execution control. We present a post-training methodology using LLMON (LLM Object N...
Basel Shbita, Michael Hind, Chad DeLuca et al.· 0 citations