Beyond the attractive potential to surrogate the tumor tissue testing, to overcome the cancer spatial and temporal heterogeneity, and to monitor the tumor mutational profile over time, accurately detecting all clinically relevant BRCA genetic variants and epigenetic modifications using LB remains technically challenging.
Abstract
The Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene (BRCA)-associated tumors represent a constantly evolving and intriguing scenario in oncology, in which the availability of novel systemic treatment, mainly including the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, has enabled an improved survival benefit in clinical subgroups. The expanding regulatory approvals of PARP inhibitors have inevitably reshaped the clinical indications for BRCA testing, moving the BRCA1/2 profiling from the traditional and preventive workflows to therapeutic paths. Despite advances in technology and treatment, substantial limitations remain in current genetic and genomic tools for the detection of deleterious BRCA1/2 variants. Germline and tumor tissue testing provide only a snapshot of a patient’s disease, failing to capture the dynamic and longitudinal aspects of tumor clonal evolution. In this scenario, liquid biopsy (LB) profiling of BRCA1/2 genes, primarily as circulating tumor DNA, represents a highly active area of research potentially affecting many aspects of cancer screening, diagnosis, and monitoring in individuals who are carriers of BRCA1/2 deleterious variants. Beyond the attractive potential to surrogate the tumor tissue testing, to overcome the cancer spatial and temporal heterogeneity, and to monitor the tumor mutational profile over time, accurately detecting all clinically relevant BRCA genetic variants and epigenetic modifications using LB remains technically challenging.
BACKGROUND
The clinical characteristics of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) deleterious alterations in advanced prostate cancer-considering age, family history, co-occurring gene alterations, and variant type-remain incompletely understood in patients undergoing tumor-only panel testing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We analyzed 2,815...
H. Tsumura, D. Koguchi, K. Tabata et al.· The Prostate· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that mainstreamed germline and somatic BRCA1/2 testing is feasible in Ireland and reports the prevalence of BRCA CAVs in a cohort of patients with OC, which is consistent with UK real-world data.
C. McNevin, Kate Murphy, P. Murchan et al.· European Journal of Human Ge...· 0 citations
This large collection of MBC cfDNA data is envisioned as an invaluable resource for the design and planning of future clinical trials, and cfDNA testing is now recommended in multiple advanced malignancies, including eligibility assessment for clinical trials.
I. Leshchiner, A. Medford, J. Cha et al.· Nature Communications· 0 citations
Continuous technological innovation, prospective multicenter validation, standardized testing protocols, and evidence-based clinical guidelines are essential to fully integrate ctDNA into routine precision breast cancer care.
E. I. Obeagu, C. Okafor· Breast Cancer: Basic and Cli...· 0 citations
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by aggressive behaviour, high tumor heterogeneity, and an increased likelihood of recurrence and early metastasis. These factors hinder successful treatment. Genetic diagnosis enables personalized clinical recommendations and treatment options. The objective of this...
D. Alzate, A. Y. Sánchez, Yovana Pacheco et al.· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
Abstract Ovarian cancer is a biologically heterogeneous disease, yet for more than two decades its standard treatment of surgery and platinum–taxane chemotherapy changed little. Only a modest additional benefit was seen with the addition of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor...
Liz Joseph, Michael J. Flynn, Jonathan A. Ledermann· International Journal of Wom...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.