AcCoRD: Evaluating User-Agent Collaboration Under Realistic User Preference Dynamics
TL;DR
This work introduces AcCoRD, a user-agent collaboration benchmark requiring agents to handle diverse user preference dynamics in two domains: online shopping and travel planning, and evaluates five frontier LLMs under two prompting strategies: vanilla ReAct, and an uncertainty-guided variant that prompts models to identify and resolve ambiguity about user preferences.
Abstract
User preferences in user-agent collaboration are rarely static and fully-specified upfront: preferences are formed, revealed, adjusted, and relaxed during interaction. Existing benchmarks for evaluating user-agent collaboration focus almost exclusively on resolving underspecified preferences, thereby failing to capture the richer dynamics of real-world interaction. We introduce AcCoRD, a user-agent collaboration benchmark requiring agents to handle diverse user preference dynamics in two domains: online shopping and travel planning. We evaluate five frontier LLMs under two prompting strategies: vanilla ReAct, and an uncertainty-guided variant that prompts models to identify and resolve ambiguity about user preferences. Our results reveal that frontier models can handle underspecification but struggle to satisfy preferences that emerge or evolve mid-interaction and require more sophisticated uncertainty modeling. Further, prompting alone fails to elicit the required uncertainty recognition. We release AcCoRD as a resource for developing agents that can navigate the full complexity of real-world user preferences.
