Skip to content

SEPO: Evidence-Grounded Prompt Optimization via Structural Editing

Aug 2026 · 1 citation · 52 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper introduces SEPO (Structural, Evidence-grounded Prompt Optimization), a multi-trajectory prompt optimiser centred on edit-effect lineage feedback that makes prompt optimisation addressable, attributable, and actionable.

Abstract

Existing API-only prompt optimisers are often described as interpretable, but in practice, this usually means only post-hoc inspectability: each iteration still rewrites the prompt as one opaque string, leaving a trace of full-prompt diffs rather than localisable, machine-readable edits. This paper introduces SEPO (Structural, Evidence-grounded Prompt Optimization), a multi-trajectory prompt optimiser centred on edit-effect lineage feedback. Rather than treating each iteration as an isolated whole-prompt rewrite, SEPO locally edits stable, typed units in a two-layer prompt schema, links the target and realised structural operations of each edit to the examples it newly fixes or breaks, and carries this edit-effect record forward to guide later architect calls on the same search branch. This makes prompt optimisation addressable, attributable, and actionable. Across a 14-task held-out suite, SEPO improves over the strongest baseline, GEPA, by 3.1 pp on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and 2.2 pp on Qwen3-8B, reaching 61.9% and 73.3% macro accuracy. SEPO also lies on both the optimisation-time and test-time Pareto frontiers, spending 2.9M optimisation tokens versus 4.1M for GEPA and producing prompts over 5x shorter.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

One Rewrite to Fix Them All? Type-Aware Repair Allocation for Text-to-Image Prompt Optimization

Text-to-image (T2I) generators often fail to follow their prompts faithfully, producing wrong counts, swapped attributes, ambiguous relations, and illegible text. Prompt optimization repairs such failures by rewriting the user prompt, requiring no generator retraining, and has yielded promising results. However, existi...

Hao-Yue Liu, Xiao-Yu Ma, Ye-Heng Chen et al. · 1 citation

Beyond Instruction-Driven Editing: Source-Grounded Problem Discovery with User-Governed Repair for Scientific Posters

This work introduces PROS (Proactive Refinement Of Scientific Posters), which separates epistemic initiative from behavioral authority: the system can surface source-grounded candidate problems, while users decide which become repair goals and whether resulting changes are committed.

Xingda Lyu, Hong-Ling Lu, Xin-ye Luo et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

From Monolithic to Modular: Segment-level Automatic Prompt Optimization

SAPO, a segment-level APO method that decomposes prompts into role, context, tasks, and output format, then applies targeted improvements based on top-5 and bottom-5 examples, achieves the best average score against Zero-shot and strong APO baselines.

N. Kulin, Viktor N. Zhuravlev, Artur R. Khairullin et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

DynaContext: Self-Improving Dynamic Contextualization of Optimized Prompts for Heterogeneous Parameter Extraction

DynaContext is introduced, a framework that combines an offline-optimized extraction core, learned with GEPA or SkillOpt, with inference-time contextual adaptation and validation-gated self-improvement, with inference-time contextual adaptation and validation-gated self-improvement.

Joe Yu, Shibin Thomas Stanley Paul, Sven Mayer · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

ESPO: Error-Structured Prompt Optimization via Diagnose, Diversify, and Stabilize

ESO (Error-Structured Prompt Optimization), which decomposes prompt optimization into three phases: Diagnose clusters all training errors into structural patterns in one round; generate candidates via four complementary strategies with independent biases; Select applies bootstrap stability selection.

Li-Hao Liu, Peng Tang, Kunwar Yashraj Singh et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

PRISM: stable black-box prompt optimization via multi-sampling and semantic consensus

PRISM is a stable model-agnostic framework that treats prompt optimization as a multi-candidate selection process instead of single-shot refinement, enabling more stable improvements and demonstrating the effectiveness of PRISM in practical settings.

Tuan-Anh Pham, C. Nguyen, Anh Tran Duc Nguyen et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.