DynaContext is introduced, a framework that combines an offline-optimized extraction core, learned with GEPA or SkillOpt, with inference-time contextual adaptation and validation-gated self-improvement, with inference-time contextual adaptation and validation-gated self-improvement.
Abstract
Automated prompt and skill optimization typically produces a single static instruction that is reused across inference instances until the next optimization cycle. However, this approach cannot adapt when the required context, constraints, and evidence vary from one instance to another. For instance, parameter extraction from electronic component descriptions breaks this assumption: resistors, capacitors, transistors, and connectors require different fields, unit constraints, and demonstrations, and each input provides a different evidence state. We introduce DynaContext, a framework that combines an offline-optimized extraction core, learned with GEPA or SkillOpt, with inference-time contextual adaptation and validation-gated self-improvement. DynaContext routes each item through internal, external, or fallback evidence paths and composes an item-specific prompt from the core, schema, evidence, unresolved fields, and validated demonstrations. Deterministic validation and an LLM judge gate every output, uncertain cases go to human review, and only human-verified corrections enter the demonstration memory. On a single-category benchmark, average accuracy increases from 86.6% for the base prompt to 96.9% for standalone SkillOpt and 98.6% for the best DynaContext configuration. Across 850 heterogeneous gold parameter facts, average field-level F1 increases from 51.8% for an unoptimized, demonstration-free control to 59.2% with dynamic demonstrations alone, 66.9% with the optimized core alone, and 71.0% with both. Holding the model fixed, the full configuration outperforms the deployed static-prompting pipeline by 17.3 F1 points on average.
This work introduces MemeMind, which uses an offline reference answer to recover missing experience in Anime, Comic, and Game meme interpretation and shows that constructing successful tool use for failed groups provides the largest component gain and produces more effective evidence acquisition at inference time.
Run Yang, Weihang Wang, Boheng Sheng et al.· 1 citation
Self-supervised automated program repair (APR) leverages project-specific perturbations to generate training data and uses test execution diagnostics to guide patch generation. In practice, however, diagnostics are heterogeneous (e.g., exception messages, stack traces, assertion diffs, and dynamic execution signals) an...
Pan Lu, Dongcheng Li, W. E. Wong· Annual International Compute...· 0 citations
This paper introduces SEPO (Structural, Evidence-grounded Prompt Optimization), a multi-trajectory prompt optimiser centred on edit-effect lineage feedback that makes prompt optimisation addressable, attributable, and actionable.
Xiao-Yu Ma, Hao-Yue Liu, Yiwen Li et al.· 1 citation
RLMOpt is introduced, a prompt optimizer that makes the search policy itself language-model-driven through a recursive language model (RLM), which operates over a tool-based environment, inspecting task information, analyzing failures, generating candidates, allocating evaluation budget, and deciding when to stop.
IFHierBench is introduced, a hierarchical instruction-following benchmark of 600 prompts stratified across four constraint-tree depths and 35 distinct constraints, each prompt paired with a deterministic checker that verifies satisfaction at every scope.
JSTestCraft reconstructs missing context via three enrichment agents: library, structural, and semantic via three enrichment agents, demonstrating that context reconstruction and agentic collaboration enable LLMs to perform more reliable and adaptive testing in dynamic JavaScript environments.