XHotpotQA is introduced, a controlled benchmark for cross-lingual knowledge composition over mixed-language evidence that provides role-aware diagnostics, modular evaluation, and an audited test bed for knowledge-based systems that must integrate evidence across languages.
Abstract
Knowledge-intensive multi-hop question answering requires systems to select evidence and compose dependent facts, yet multilingual benchmarks usually translate an entire example into one language. This hides failures at language boundaries inside the reasoning chain. We introduce XHotpotQA, a controlled benchmark for cross-lingual knowledge composition over mixed-language evidence. Each instance is modeled as an evidence-dependency graph whose question, bridge evidence, answer-bearing evidence, and distractors have explicit language assignments. The audited resource contains 15,661 training and 7,405 validation instances, with sentence-level support supervision and supplied distractors. In validation, 99.81% of items cross the question-to-gold-evidence language interface and 95.60% use gold paragraphs in different languages. Across three reader artifacts, full question-evidence mismatch is associated with 10.25 to 15.79 lower Unicode-aware answer F1 than partial alignment, and different-script evidence with deficits of 11.98 to 23.70 points; the corresponding adapted-selector contrasts are 1.71 and 1.78 points. Under this supplied-candidate design, the evaluated readers therefore show substantially larger condition-associated deficits than the selector. XHotpotQA provides role-aware diagnostics, modular evaluation, and an audited test bed for knowledge-based systems that must integrate evidence across languages.
We present L3Cube-IndicQuest v2, a large-scale gold-standard multilingual question-answering benchmark for evaluating the India-specific factual knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs). The benchmark comprises 3,471 curriculum-grounded English question--answer pairs spanning nine domains, curated from educational cur...
Rinit Jain, Tirthraj Mahajan, Advait Joshi et al.· 0 citations
By evaluating paper retrieval, evidence grounding, and answer accuracy separately, LitTraceQA provides a testbed for scientific QA systems that produce verifiable answers rather than unsupported summaries.
This work introduces DocHop, a benchmark for integrated chart--context reasoning in document-style images and constructs DocHop via a stochastic logic-first generation pipeline with controllable reasoning depth and visual density, to enable systematic evaluation.
Zhuoran Yu, Le Thien Phuc Nguyen, Jaden Park et al.· 1 citation
(English) Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) is a fundamental benchmark for evaluating natural language understanding systems, requiring models to generate answers grounded in context. Despite advances with transformer-based architectures and large language models (LLMs), challenges persist in multilingual and cross-l...
V\={a}kQA, a Telugu SQA benchmark of 2,001 factoid question-answer pairs across six domains, is introduced and it is observed that Telugu phrasing retains cultural specificity that is lost in translation, speech input introduces phonetic confusions that alter question meaning, and cascaded ASR-MT errors compound progre...
Bhavana Akkiraju, Ravi Sastry Kolluru, D. SriCharan et al.· 0 citations
A systematic review of 137 shortlisted research articles reveals that the performance of a cross-lingual QA system is structurally influenced by the interaction between linguistic typology, model design, and not exclusively by model scale or architecture.