Skip to content

VLM-in-Sandbox: Visual Workspaces for Agentic Visual Reasoning

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 42 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Across seven benchmarks and four base VLMs, VLM-in-Sandbox achieves the highest sample-weighted average accuracy among Vanilla VLM, Append-only Sandbox, and the proposed method, and is identified as a central abstraction for sandboxed VLM agents.

Abstract

Sandboxed computer environments support multi-step reasoning with tools, executable programs, and persistent files, yet their extension from language models to vision-language models (VLMs) introduces a distinct state-management problem. Visual reasoning produces intermediate image-valued evidence---crops, masks, overlays, zoomed regions, and analytic renderings---that must remain addressable without accumulating unboundedly in multimodal context. We introduce VLM-in-Sandbox, a training-free framework for agentic multimodal reasoning in controlled computer environments. Its Visual Workspace registers generated artifacts in an image ledger, maintains a bounded active visual context, and lets the model explicitly promote selected evidence for subsequent inspection. This separates visual evidence generation, performed by sandbox tools, from visual evidence management. Across seven benchmarks and four base VLMs, VLM-in-Sandbox achieves the highest sample-weighted average accuracy among Vanilla VLM, Append-only Sandbox, and the proposed method. A compiler-matched $2\times2$ study on 1,260 examples further separates model-directed visibility from bounded retention: VLM-in-Sandbox reaches 66.27% accuracy with 18.6% fewer total tokens than the automatic, retain-all control. Over all 6,350 submitted GPT-4.1-mini examples, it produces 302 rescues and 142 regressions relative to Original Append-only. A local vLLM study with prefix caching confirms that the smaller request workload also reduces uncached tokens, time to first token, and end-to-end latency. These results identify explicit visual evidence state as a central abstraction for sandboxed VLM agents.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Collaborative Memory for Multi-Agent VLM Systems

This paper frames memory hierarchy, cross-agent sharing, and consistency mechanisms around the need to reconcile interpretations and update dependent reasoning around the need to reconcile interpretations and update dependent reasoning inVision-language model agents.

Hui-Xin Zhang, Shao-Jun Xia, Di Wang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

CodeActionBench: Evaluating Agentic Code-as-Policy for Embodied Manipulation

CodeActionBench is introduced, a benchmark of 25 manipulation tasks that evaluates this capability through agentic Code-as-Policy and provides a controlled testbed for measuring how general-purpose models translate their capabilities into manipulation behavior and for examining typical failure scenarios in that process...

Yiheng Lyu, Xueying Jiang, Wen-Hao Li et al. · 3 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

WM-VLM: Probing Internal World Models for Interleaved Visual-Textual Reasoning

WM-VLM is introduced, which equips a pretrained VLM with a lightweight world model branch for generating intermediate visual states and suggests that internal world models offer a promising path toward VLMs that reason in both language and visual space.

Yuheng Zha, Yi-Lei Wang, Qiyue Gao et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

WidgetVA: A Widget-Centric Framework and Benchmark for Agentic Visual Analytics

This work introduces WidgetVA, a widget-centric agentic VA framework that standardizes interactive components as structured widgets with unified action and perception-query APIs and presents WidgetVABench, a benchmark of single- and multi-widget VA tasks that require agents to perform multi-step interactions to uncover...

Yu-Tong Chen, Zhi-Ke Tang, Zhi-Hao Mai et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Self-Evolving Code-with-Image Reasoning

Multimodal models increasingly reach for tools when solving visual tasks (crop, zoom, rotate, brighten), a paradigm known as thinking-with-images. The central challenge is one of perception: tools mostly serve to expose visual evidence, reasoning over that evidence stays in language, and most targets are ones a human c...

Tianze Yang, Liang Wu, Rui Sun et al. · 1 citation

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.