Skip to content

Predicting Symptoms of Amotivation and Anhedonia among University Students with a Novel Oversampling Method

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 46 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A novel and effective oversampling method that leverages a predictive model to generate nominal variables, rather than interpolating them and is significantly better than existing oversampling approaches in predicting elevated symptoms of amotivation and anhedonia.

Abstract

University students experience disproportionately high rates of common mental health conditions, such as depression, which can impair learning, social functioning, and overall well-being. Within this context, symptoms of amotivation (i.e. loss of motivational drive) and anhedonia (i.e. diminished interest or pleasure) are particularly debilitating, yet they frequently go undetected. Developing new approaches to identify students with prominent amotivation and anhedonia could enable earlier and more targeted intervention. Machine learning (ML) methods have increasingly been used to classify individuals according to symptom severity. However, these ML models often suffer from class imbalance, where the majority of cases fall in the low-symptom group and relatively few in the high-symptom group. This imbalance can reduce model accuracy and bias predictions. To address this, studies commonly employ the popular oversampling strategy SMOTE. However, SMOTE has a notable limitation: it may generate invalid values for nominal variables. In this paper, we introduce a novel and effective oversampling method that addresses this shortcoming. Our approach leverages a predictive model to generate nominal variables, rather than interpolating them. We validate our method on a large-scale GPS location dataset collected from university students and demonstrate that it is significantly better than existing oversampling approaches in predicting elevated symptoms of amotivation and anhedonia.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.