Skip to content

RADAR: Readiness for AI Discovery and Agentic Reach

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 16 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

RADAR lets governments at any income level see it and offer a concrete agenda to fix it, so that public services are not only described by AI but actually reachable through it.

Abstract

Governments increasingly meet citizens through an AI system rather than a website. RADAR (Readiness for AI Discovery and Agentic Reach) measures whether that system works, across 166 countries and on two tasks: whether a chatbot can give a correct, officially sourced, country-specific answer about a public service (informational legibility), and whether an automated agent can reach the service to act on it (agent operability). The central finding is that AI can describe public services far better than it can reach them. In every one of the 166 countries, informational legibility scores exceed average agent operability scores under RADAR's respective measures, and the gap does not shrink with national wealth. Income and language explain only part of the pattern, and several governments perform far better or worse than their resources predict. The two failures have different correlates and different fixes. Whether AI can describe a service is associated with how well a country's main administrative language is represented in web-scale corpora, which a government cannot change quickly. Whether an agent can reach it is associated with the country's national web presence, which a government can change now. Traditional digital-government rankings miss the second problem entirely. RADAR lets governments at any income level see it and offers a concrete agenda to fix it, so that public services are not only described by AI but actually reachable through it.

View source

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Nothing new under the sun: Agentic AI and the automated, connected catalog

ABSTRACT The emergence of agentic AI is an important technology trend, and its implications for technical services librarianship have the potential to be profound. Agentic AI is introduced and distinguished from generative AI through its capacity to pursue goals, coordinate specialized agents, and carry out multi-step...

Nicole Darcy, H. Jansen, C. Burns et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

ERPBench: A State-Grounded Evaluation Paradigm for Computer-Use Agents in Enterprise Software

ERPBench is introduced, a benchmark that evaluates screenshot-only agents on a live and reproducible system and scores each task against ground-truth values in its database and presents a production-grade harness that gates agent actions behind human approval for safe deployment.

Kratika Bhagtani, K. Sridhar, M. B. Pouyan et al. · 1 citation
Open access Aug 2026

Do you know what your AI agent can do on its own?

A two-dimensional design space is introduced in which both dimensions are organised into five operational levels, making the coupling explicit and navigable, and six architectural tactics for adjusting a deployment’s position within it are proposed, offering a shared vocabulary for compliance-aware agentic AI design.

D. Safin, Dian Baltaa, Timon Sengewaldb et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Five Primitives for Governing Autonomous AI Agents at Runtime

It is argued that governing such agents is a runtime problem -- not a model-alignment problem and not a build-time problem -- and five primitives are derived from the questions that must be answered before an action takes effect and after it has: discovery, identity, governance, attestation, and supply chain.

Jiten Oswal, John Cadeddu · 1 citation
Review Sep 2026

Research with AI Agents: How Agentic Systems Are Changing Scientific Work

Background. Agentic AI systems independently decompose tasks such as literature search, data analysis, and programming into subtasks, search the web, access databases, and execute code. This allows them to perform digital research tasks at high speed. Objectives. Under what conditions does the use of agentic systems pr...

Johannes B. Lötz, M. Wenzel · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Measuring AI-Agent Accessibility of Web Applications: A Construct-Development Framework

Agents built on large language models (LLMs) now browse, fill in forms and complete transactions on websites that were designed for people looking at a screen. Existing standards do not describe what such an agent needs from a page. WCAG 2.2 sets requirements for human users of assistive technology, and interoperabilit...

Oluwaseyi Adediran, Odumuyiwa Teslim, Oluwafemi Memuletiwon, Oluwaseun Ogunseitan, Joseph Adewuyi, Alfred Udosen, Opeyemi Adelowo · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.