Skip to content
#artificial intelligence Review Open access

The Question's Ear: A Narrative Review of SETI from Cocconi and Morrison's Nature Letter to the Haystack's Measurement

Aug 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life

Abstract

SETI---the search for extraterrestrial intelligence whose instrument is the radio telescope and whose subject is the universe's others---moved from Cocconi and Morrison's 1959 Nature letter and Drake's Project Ozma through Kardashev's civilizations, Dyson's spheres, the Cyclops blueprint, and Sagan and Drake's Scientific American to Tarter's review, Vakoch's communication, Siemion's Kepler survey, Wright's WISE search and haystack, and Frank and Sullivan's empirical constraint. This article presents a narrative review of that arc's canonical line: Cocconi and Morrison's 1959 searching, Dyson's 1960 artificial sources, Drake's 1961 Project Ozma, Kardashev's 1964 transmissions, Oliver and Billingham's 1973 Project Cyclops, Sagan and Drake's 1975 Scientific American, Tarter's 2001 Annual Review, Vakoch's 2011 communication volume, Siemion and colleagues's 2013 Kepler survey, Wright and colleagues's 2016 large energy supplies, Frank and Sullivan's 2016 empirical constraint, and Wright and colleagues's 2018 haystack. The review is organized around three themes: the question's scientific founding, in which the Nature letter's frequency, the Ozma's listening, the civilizations's types, and the spheres's infrareds made the question scientific; the programs' blueprints, in which the Cyclops's design, the Scientific American's summary, and the review's systematization built the field's plans; and the modern searches, in which the communication's, the Kepler's narrowbands, the large energy's supplies, the empirical's constraint, and the haystack's measurement carried the search into the twenty-first century's scales. It is concluded that SETI is the universe's longest question---and that its arc is the listening's persistence from the one-star's wager to the multi-million's stars.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Nov 2024

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...

Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al. · 121 citations · ⚡9
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2025

Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...

Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee · 112 citations · ⚡10

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.