2025· International Scientific Conference ERAZ - Knowledge Based Sustainable Development· 0 citations· 19 references
TL;DR
This paper explores how AI risk governance can be effectively integrated into the epistemological and structural foundations of such organizations through the lens of fourth-order cybernetics, and offers a conceptual pathway for resilient and ethically aligned AI implementation in complex organizational environments.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly embedded in the structures of knowledge-based organizations, the governance of AI-related risks is emerging as a critical factor for long-term systemic sustainability. This paper explores how AI risk governance can be effectively integrated into the epistemological and structural foundations of such organizations through the lens of fourth-order cybernetics. This theoretical framework emphasizes reflexivity, ethical co-construction, and multilevel feedback involving both human and technical agents. Rather than treating governance as a static set of compliance measures, the proposed model presents it as a dynamic and participatory process. Four core principles are introduced: multilevel feedback, contextual ethics, recursive governance, and the inclusion of marginalized perspectives. These principles support the embedding of AI governance into decision-making and knowledge management systems. The paper contributes to responsible innovation discourse and offers a conceptual pathway for resilient and ethically aligned AI implementation in complex organizational environments.
Examining how artificial intelligence (AI) governance supports sustainable decision-making across organizational contexts in Europe reveals that governance increasingly aligns with formal frameworks through policies, dedicated structures, human oversight and Environmental, Social and Governance oriented indicators, enh...
Fernando Almeida· Journal of Ethics in Entrepr...· 0 citations
The HCSAIGF contributes to AI governance research by providing an integrated explanatory architecture and offers a conceptual basis for future empirical research and more coherent governance practices.
Emre İmamoğlu· Journal of Perspectives in M...· 0 citations
The SLR demonstrates that effective AI and digital platform governance demands a holistic, context-sensitive approach that actively balances efficiency with justice, innovation with accountability, and risk with public value.
A lifecycle-oriented socio-technical governance capacity framework through a structured synthesis of public administration, digital government, decision support systems, responsible AI, socio-technical systems, sustainability, and risk governance scholarship is developed.
Analysis of publicly available AI principles from FT Global 500 companies shows that AI principles function as strategic business communication that blends ethical commitments, socio-technical safeguards, and stakeholder value propositions.
M. Huhta, Anu E. Sivunen, W. van Zoonen· International Journal of Bus...· 0 citations
It is argued that AI adoption should be understood not merely as automation but as a technology-transfer problem, and the AITTF is introduced, a seven-stage governance model designed to help organisations transfer workflows, expertise and decision-making into AI-enabled systems while maintaining accountability, operati...
Musarat Kabir-Chisty· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.