Jul 2026· International Journal of Business Communication· 0 citations· 46 references
TL;DR
Analysis of publicly available AI principles from FT Global 500 companies shows that AI principles function as strategic business communication that blends ethical commitments, socio-technical safeguards, and stakeholder value propositions.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) adoption accelerates, organizations must communicate its role, value, and governance to diverse stakeholders. A common response is to “get principled” and create AI principles that respond to stakeholder demands for transparent, fair, ethical, explainable, and safe AI use, while fostering employees’ AI adoption. Based on 99 publicly available AI principles from FT Global 500 companies, this study examines how large corporations use these texts as institutional messages that declare organizational beliefs and rules for AI use. We examine how they legitimize and position organizations as AI enablers. The analysis shows that AI principles function as strategic business communication that blends ethical commitments, socio-technical safeguards, and stakeholder value propositions. The study contributes to discussions on institutional theory, organizational communication, and AI governance by explaining how governance-related corporate texts construct legitimacy and organizational identity amid technological change in contemporary global corporate communication.
With the rapid advancement of Information Technology, including Artificial Intelligence (AI), organisations are innovating much faster, yet at the same time are also dealing with the complexities of regulation and governance. But as AI regulations continue to develop, organizations are faced with a challenge to impleme...
Anilreddy , Thu Phuong Bhimavarapu , Vu· Journal of Business Practice...· 0 citations
By showing that AI use intensifies rather than replaces human judgment, the study underscores the continued centrality of human responsibility in public decision-making and suggests that effective AI governance requires a shift from restrictive, compliance-focused approaches towards enabling and adaptive strategies.
This article contends that Shadow AI is more than just a Cybersecurity or compliance issue; it is also an ethical governance problem because hidden use obscures accountability, reduces transparency, shifts responsibility onto individual workers, and gives rise to concerns regarding privacy, fairness, and the need for h...
Alfredo Gavito Romero, V. López-Morales, A. Franco-Árcega et al.· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
This paper explores how AI risk governance can be effectively integrated into the epistemological and structural foundations of such organizations through the lens of fourth-order cybernetics, and offers a conceptual pathway for resilient and ethically aligned AI implementation in complex organizational environments.
Ludmila Jiříčková, Petr Doucek· International Scientific Con...· 0 citations
Current AI governance strategies and guardrails ensure that AI systems adhere to the ethical principles, legal requirements, and safety standards. However, they create organisational rigidity which could potentially delay new deployments, fail to capture tacit qualitative information, are sometimes unable to enforce th...
M. Nkwo, M. Adamu, Francis Brako et al.· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
This study aims to conceptualize AI washing as a knowledge governance failure (KGF) and develops a framework explaining how persistent symbolic AI adoption progressively undermines organizational learning, knowledge validation and capability development.
Yun-Jie Wang, Wei Zhang· Journal of Knowledge Managem...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.