A practical framework for integrating Gen AI into physics instruction through the use of context prompts: instructor-designed prompts that define the role, task, and boundaries of the AI interaction is described.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) is increasingly shaping how students access information and engage with physics content, yet many instructional approaches still assume a pre-AI classroom. In this paper, we describe a practical framework for integrating Gen AI into physics instruction through the use of context prompts: instructor-designed prompts that define the role, task, and boundaries of the AI interaction. We focus on AI-supported exploration assignments implemented in an asynchronous introductory physics course enrolling approximately 70 students. In these activities, students used AI as a guided tutor to explore selected topics, ask follow-up questions, request explanations and analogies, and connect physics concepts to their personal interests and everyday experiences. We argue that this structure can help move students beyond answer-seeking and toward more dialogic and personally meaningful engagement with course content. We also discuss reflection as a natural extension of the same framework, while distinguishing it from the implemented exploration activities described here. Finally, we highlight practical considerations that emerged in use, including uneven access to AI platforms, grading workload, the need to teach students how to engage AI conversationally, and the growing importance of AI literacy in physics education.
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) applications such as ChatGPT present a distinct challenge for computer
science (CS) students. While they offer individualized learning support, unregulated use risks facilitating academic
shortcuts and eroding critical thinking skills. This article introduces Lion-AI, a chatbot...
Blessing C. Uzo, Micah Okpara, E. Chukwuemeka et al.· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
This paper presents a structured approach to integrating AI tutors into undergraduate computer architecture courses at a medium-sized Hispanic-Serving Institution. We propose a system in which AI functions as a scaffolded learning partner designed to promote articulation, reflection, and independent reasoning, rather t...
Alberto Cruz, Anjana Yatawara, Maruti V. Mishra et al.· CoED· 0 citations
How students interact with artificial intelligence (AI) systems in educational settings may determine whether that interaction supports or displaces critical thinking. This paper introduces two contributions. The first is the Three Paths of Student-AI Interaction, a typological framework identifying three qualitatively...
The results suggest that the pedagogical behavior of AI tutors may not be easily steered through system prompts alone: embedding established SRL and CE frameworks did not produce detectable improvements on any preregistered outcome in a large, ecologically valid deployment.
Maximilian Georg Barth, Sverrir Thorgeirsson, K. Etemadi et al.· International Computing Educ...· 0 citations
A teacher-student-AI coordination model for interactive-generative teaching is proposed that identifies three conditions under which AI support can become pedagogically meaningful and provides a course-level pathway for redesigning content, interaction, process, and assessment in Comprehensive English.
Sha Li, Yuheng Sun· Frontiers in Educational Res...· 0 citations
Students increasingly study alongside generative artificial intelligence (AI), yet unguided access to fluent answers invites cognitive offloading, and there is little evidence on which configurations of AI tutoring produce learning. Two design margins are usually bundled together: pedagogical structure (how the tutor t...
Shi-Hao Yang, Marshall W. van Alstyne, Chrysanthos N. Dellarocas· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.