Skip to content
#small language model Dataset Open access

FIE-sLLM Benchmark v1.1: ontology-constrained decoding for small open language models on clinical nutrition abstracts (code, results, raw outputs)

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 1 references

Abstract

Companion material for the article Ontology-Constrained Decoding for Small Open Language Models: Structural Gains, Content Trade-offs, and Silent Omission in Clinical Nutrition Abstract Extraction (submitted to IEEE Access, 2026). Six open small language models (Granite-4.0-1B, Qwen3-1.7B, Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507, Phi-4-mini-instruct, Kanana-1.5-8B, Granite-4.1-8B) were run under four conditions (C0 free generation; C1 schema in prompt; C2 structure-constrained decoding; C3 ontology-constrained decoding with controlled vocabulary) and a rule baseline on 1,658 frozen PubMed abstracts on vitamin D and probiotics. Records were validated in two stages (JSON Schema, closed-world ontology rules) before knowledge-graph insertion and evaluated with gold-free structural metrics, agreement with 386 linked ClinicalTrials.gov registrations, and blinded two-judge human assessment of 360 records. The record contains three archives: (1) code, ontology v1.1 (OWL), extraction profile, controlled vocabulary, derived JSON Schemas, prompts, freeze manifests and corpus manifest (PMIDs and hashes; abstract text is not redistributed); (2) all result tables, paired statistics, per-run metrics, and the human-judgment analysis tables with reproducible code; (3) per-abstract raw model outputs and validation results for every run, KG exports, and ClinicalTrials.gov snapshots. See README.md inside each archive. Ontology v1.0 was first released in an earlier reproducibility package (10.5281/zenodo.20774211); this record supersedes it with ontology v1.1 (adds the hasArm property), a new frozen corpus (1,858 abstracts), and a different benchmark design. Code: MIT. Data and outputs: CC BY 4.0. Copyright holder: ANCHOR Program, Jeonju University; author: Dongwook Han. Funding: This research was supported by the Regional Innovation System & Education (RISE) program through the Jeonbuk State RISE Center, funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and Jeonbuk State, Republic of Korea (grant number: 2026-RISE-13-JJU). Version 1.1 (25 September 2026): revision after an independent review of the manuscript. The code and results archives are updated; the raw-outputs archive is unchanged from v1.0 (same file). Changes: (a) scripts/70_stats.py v2 and results/stats_eval.csv — for the registry metrics (primary-field agreement, valid-but-discordant rate) the 386 silver-standard abstracts are resampled by registered trial (318 NCT clusters) for the 95% bootstrap intervals, and the field-level McNemar test is replaced by a cluster sign-flip permutation test (10,000 permutations, seed 20260921) with Holm adjustment; the record-level McNemar test for KG insertion is unchanged; the metric formerly named valid_but_wrong is now valid_but_discordant. (b) New scripts/72_pruning_density.py with results/pruning_eval.csv (elements removed by the predefined normalization pruning rule, per model and condition) and results/density_common_eval.csv (nodes per record on abstracts inserted under both C1 and C3). (c) Figure 3 regenerated; figure/table build sources reduced to make_figs.py, build_tables.py and tables.json. (d) PubMed candidate lists (data/candidates/*.csv) added, documenting the query strings, search date (2026-06-16), relevance sort order and hit counts. No prompt, schema, normalization rule, corpus file or raw model output was changed. See "Changes in v1.1" in README.md.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#computer vision Open access Feb 2018

Lean Internal Startups for Software Product Innovation in Large Companies: Enablers and Inhibitors

This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.

Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 78 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Conference Sep 2010

Exploring the Sources of Waste in Kanban Software Development Projects

The application of agile software methods and more recently the integration of Lean practices contribute to the trend of continuous improvement in the software industry. One such area warranting proper empirical evidence is a project’s operational efficiency when using the Kanban method. This short paper takes a new an...

Marko Ikonen, Petri Kettunen, Nilay V. Oza et al. · 67 citations · ⚡9

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 30, 2026

This game-playing AI is the new champ at Stratego

Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.