Due to its significant importance in many disciplines, distributed optimization under uncertainty has become an active research field over the past decade. This paper presents a cross-paradigm review of this development. We organize the literature around three approaches ordered by how much is known about the uncertainty: robust optimization, which uses set or support information; distributionally robust optimization, which uses partial distributional knowledge; and stochastic programming, which uses an estimated or specified distribution. These are regions of a spectrum rather than disjoint classes, and formulations that combine them are noted where they arise. For each approach, we examine modeling frameworks and distributed algorithmic adaptations, together with representative applications across different domains. We synthesize methodological trends, compare algorithmic properties, and identify open challenges for scalable distributed algorithms under uncertainty. Key findings include the widespread adaptation of classical algorithms, particularly the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), across all uncertainty paradigms, alongside an evolution toward data-driven and adaptive methods for real-time uncertainty handling. We also highlight that many advanced centralized techniques for optimization under uncertainty remain only partially adapted to distributed settings, representing a significant research opportunity. Of the 112 reviewed studies falling within the 2015–2025 eligibility window, 59.8% address power and energy systems, 12.5% federated and distributed learning, and 5.4% robotics and autonomous systems, while other application domains contribute only isolated studies. The paper concludes with critical gaps and future directions spanning distributed reformulations, machine learning integration, multi-stage optimization, privacy-preserving computation, and cross-domain methodological unification.
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
It is found that roles of MVPs in startups were not fully aware by entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs should consider a systematic approach to fully explore the value of MVP, as a multiple facet product (MFP).
Anh Nguyen-Duc, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 93 citations· ⚡9
It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.
Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al.· International Conference on...· 62 citations· ⚡6
A comprehensive overview of how enhanced sampling methods are reshaping the field, with a particular focus on the data-driven construction of collective variables, is provided.
Kai Zhu, Enrico Trizio, Jintu Zhang et al.· Chemical Reviews· 58 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 6, 2026