β-Blocker Discontinuation after Myocardial Infarction without Reduced Ejection Fraction in the Revascularization Era: A Design-Coherent Bayesian Review & Meta-Analysis
Sep 2026· Journal of Saidu Medical College· Vol 16· 0 citations
TL;DR
In contemporary revascularized patients with preserved or mildly reduced EF, β-blocker discontinuation was not associated with a credible increase in death or MACE, whether stopped in the stable phase or the acute-withdrawal phase; the prior harm likely reflects immortal-time bias and inclusion of non-revascularized patients.
Abstract
Background & Objective: β-Blockers are prescribed indefinitely after myocardial infarction (MI), yet in contemporary revascularized patients with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF), their value remains uncertain, and the question of whether an established β-blocker can be electively discontinued is common. Prior syntheses pooled three distinct scenarios (acute withdrawal, immortal-time–susceptible duration comparisons, and elective late discontinuation), obscuring their differences.
Methodology: We performed a Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis comparing β-blocker discontinuation versus continuation, restricted to design-coherent studies (shared post-establishment baseline) in contemporary, revascularized patients with EF >40% (or no LV dysfunction), no heart failure, and on a β-blocker for ≥1 month. Duration-based and acute-withdrawal designs were analyzed only in sensitivity analyses. We report pooled hazard ratios with 95% credible intervals, the probability of direction (pd), and the fraction within a region of practical equivalence (ROPE).
Results: Seven design-coherent studies (2 randomized trials, 5 cohorts; 88,514 patients) were pooled. No estimate was credible (pd ≥97.5%): all-cause mortality 1.01 (0.83–1.19) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) 1.07 (0.93–1.20) sat closest to practical equivalence, while recurrent MI (1.20) and cardiovascular death (1.13) were inconclusive. Estimates were stable when randomized acute-withdrawal trials were added but inflated with duration-based studies (cardiovascular death 1.64).
Conclusion: In contemporary revascularized patients with preserved or mildly reduced EF, β-blocker discontinuation was not associated with a credible increase in death or MACE, whether stopped in the stable phase or the acute-withdrawal phase; the prior harm likely reflects immortal-time bias and inclusion of non-revascularized patients. Discontinuation is a reasonable, individualized option; the recurrent-MI signal warrants confirmation.
Key Words: Beta Blocker, Myocardial Infarction, Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Beta-blocker (BB) therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is well established. However, recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in post-MI patients without significantly impaired LVEF have yielded conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed...
I. F. Arba, A. Primiputri, M. B. A. Paramarta et al.· European Heart Journal, Supp...· 0 citations
In stable patients with previous myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, no heart failure, and no other indication for β-blocker therapy, discontinuation met the non-inferiority criteria for the primary and key secondary endpoints.
J. Silvain, Ki H. Choi, Victorien Monguillon et al.· The Lancet· 1 citation
The clinical role of beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) has been debated extensively as the landscape of post-MI management has evolved. Historically, beta-blockers were established as a cornerstone of secondary prevention following landmark randomized controlled trials conducted in the 1980s (Hjalma...
Krzysztof Machnik, B. Tekieli, Wojciech Krzysztof Cyran et al.· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
The modified TRS-2P stratified baseline risk and provided estimates of absolute beta-blocker benefit, supporting further evaluation of individualized, risk-guided treatment after MI in patients with LVEF ≥40%.
H. Caglar, T. Holmager, A. Kristensen et al.· European Heart Journal - Qua...· 0 citations
In this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, beta-blocker use was not associated with a significant reduction in the primary composite outcome or in mortality or reinfarction, and should be interpreted with caution in the context of an overall neutral result.
Leonardo David Neira-Chunga, Diego Moncada-Gutiérrez, G. Vásquez-Tirado et al.· Medicina Intensiva· 0 citations
Historically, beta-blockers have long represented a cornerstone of secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the transition to the modern era of early reperfusion and potent pharmacotherapy has questioned their universal efficacy, particularly in patients without post-AMI left ventricular d...
Chiara Cosentino, L. Cutore, Carmelo Raffo et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.