AldonTag is presented, a multimodal framework for open-world AI coding agent attribution, evaluated on AIDev, and shows that reliable attribution of AI coding agents is feasible and clarify the practical trade-offs between attribution accuracy and the information required to achieve it.
Abstract
AI coding agents increasingly author pull requests (PRs), often under developers'own accounts, obscuring who actually produced a change. Reliable attribution is important for repository governance, empirical studies of AI-assisted software development, and measuring the impact of AI coding agents. Existing work focuses on closed-set identification of known agents, leaving the practical limits of open-world AI coding agent attribution largely unexplored. In this paper, we present AgenTag, a multimodal framework for open-world AI coding agent attribution, evaluated on AIDev, comprising 33,580 PRs from five AI coding agents and 6,618 human-authored PRs. We represent each PR using textual, behavioral, and code-based modalities, and compare conventional classification with supervised contrastive learning for open-set recognition and few-shot enrollment of previously unseen agents. AgenTag identifies authoring agents with a weighted F1 of 0.96 (macro F1 of 0.84), distinguishes AI- from human-authored PRs with a balanced F1 of 0.89, and detects previously unseen agents with an AUC of 0.84. We further show that PR descriptions and commit messages provide nearly all of the attribution signal, whereas code diffs contribute little across multiple representations, indicating that coding agents are distinguished primarily by how they communicate changes rather than by the code they generate. Moreover, these behavioral fingerprints persist after removing explicit self-disclosed markers, demonstrating that attribution relies largely on latent stylistic characteristics. These findings show that reliable attribution of AI coding agents is feasible and clarify the practical trade-offs between attribution accuracy and the information required to achieve it.
AI-research agents, or autoresearch systems, combine language models with tools, search, evaluation, and iterative modification of research artifacts. Their public software ecology is hard to compare because repositories, papers, benchmarks, libraries, and companion artifacts are often counted as one population. We con...
It is argued that published acceptance figures describe a narrow and unusually demanding slice of GitHub, and it is recommended that studies of agent contributions report the popularity distribution of their repositories and estimate effects within repositories rather than across them.
Perseus Bhavnagri· International Journal for Re...· 0 citations
This work proposes A-B-D to infer traits bottom-up from behavioral data (B-data), namely how agents act on their environment and communicate with users, as recorded in existing trajectories, and offers a new lens for understanding AI personality.
Hao-Kai Zhao, Jie Gao, Yunze Xiao et al.· 0 citations
Evaluation of agentic information retrieval remains limited to scripted interactions with uniform users, missing both natural personality diversity and adversarial brittleness. We present AgentWorld, a simulation framework combining (i)Big Five (OCEAN) personality-driven user populations with stateful tool-use environm...
Gunjan Agarwal, Arup Das, Arun Menon et al.· 1 citation
Overall, closed-loop AI-to-AI review is increasing but remains a minority of identified agent activity, with review output varying across authoring-agent groups and product configurations.
The findings show that AI is not perceived as socially neutral but instead acquires racial meanings associated with credibility, authority, and capability, demonstrating how social categories shape perceptions of novel technological entities beyond their underlying algorithmic properties.
M. Gamez-Djokic, Adam Waytz· Journal of Personality and S...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.