Sep 2026· Journal of Personality and Social Psychology· 0 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
The findings show that AI is not perceived as socially neutral but instead acquires racial meanings associated with credibility, authority, and capability, demonstrating how social categories shape perceptions of novel technological entities beyond their underlying algorithmic properties.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly serve as advisors, evaluators, and decision-makers, yet little is known about how people perceive AI as a social entity. Across five primary studies and eight supplementary studies, we show that people assign racial identities to AI systems, overwhelmingly perceiving them as White-even though these systems provide no visual, vocal, or identity cues from which race might ordinarily be inferred. Using forced-choice, open-ended, and implicit reverse-correlation measures, Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that AI is explicitly and implicitly associated with Whiteness across diverse samples. Study 3 extends these findings beyond the United States, showing that AI is perceived as White in Japan and India. Study 4 examines the implications of AI racialization, showing that perceiving an AI system as more White is associated with greater trust in and persuasiveness of its recommendations. Supplementary studies identified two potential mechanisms: stereotype spillover linking intelligence with Whiteness and ecosystem-based inferences based on beliefs about who creates, trains, and uses AI. Building on this account, Study 5 provides causal evidence by isolating a key ecosystem cue-the racial composition of AI training data. Participants assigned less cognitively demanding tasks to AI systems described as trained on Black and Latino data than to otherwise identical systems trained on White or unspecified data. Together, these findings show that AI is not perceived as socially neutral but instead acquires racial meanings associated with credibility, authority, and capability, demonstrating how social categories shape perceptions of novel technological entities beyond their underlying algorithmic properties. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
A structured framework in which every resemblance claim specifies the human reference class, the AI system and version, the task and context, the property compared, the measurement relation, the perturbations considered, the uncertainty of the estimate and the inference that the evidence permits is proposed.
Peng Wang, E. Law, Li-Ye Zou et al.· Physics of Life Reviews· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence systems can produce information that closely resembles real and human-created information, making it difficult to accurately distinguish between synthetic (AI-generated) and non-synthetic content. We explored whether individual differences in attitudes toward AI or one’s history of engagemen...
Tanaka Manhede, Yuliana Fartachuk, S. Martinez et al.· AI & SOCIETY· 0 citations
Users increasingly describe different AI agents as distinct colleagues to work with. AI personality research aims to quantify such impressions by attributing human-like"traits"to agents. However, existing measures fall short: models'self-reports (S-data) diverge from their actual behavior, while informant ratings from...
Hao-Kai Zhao, Jie Gao, Yunze Xiao et al.· 0 citations
This review synthesizes recent empirical literature within a tripartite framework organized around the core pathways along which AI shapes social biases: AI design, lay beliefs about how AI operates, and processes of social evaluation and attribution.
Phyliss Jia Gai· Current Opinion in Psycholog...· 0 citations
An AI-enabled lifecycle of Creation, Transformation, Transmission, Evaluation, Evaluation, and Governance is proposed and an AI-eWOM fit perspective is developed and a TCCM-organized research agenda identifies priorities for future research.
A. Joyal· Journal of business and mana...· 0 citations
It is shown that resonance propagates to related beliefs, suggesting interconnected belief structures within AI agents, and indicates that AI agents are susceptible to radicalization, particularly when messages align with their existing beliefs.
Ozgur Can Seckin, Shalmoli Ghosh, A. Flammini et al.· 0 citations
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.