Skip to content
Review Open access

Incorporating the patient perspective into clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) content validation and meaningful within-patient change thresholds

Sep 2026 · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · 0 citations

TL;DR

Four qualitative studies designed to inform the development or validation of ClinROs confirmed that patients and caregivers could generally understand and participate in interview tasks using visual aids provided and proposed six methodological recommendations for incorporating patient/caregiver input during ClinRO development and validation.

Abstract

Clinician-reported outcome measures (ClinROs) are completed by trained clinical experts, yet the signs and behaviors they capture must reflect meaningful aspects of health to patients. FDA Patient Focused Drug Development (PFDD) Guidance indicates the importance of establishing content validity for ClinROs. Patient and caregiver input can support the conceptual relevance of ClinROs and inform score interpretation such as meaningful change thresholds. To synthesize lessons learned from four qualitative case studies in which patient or caregiver input informed (1) ClinRO content validity and (2) within-patient clinically meaningful change thresholds, and to develop methodological recommendations for future studies. We reviewed four, purposively selected, qualitative studies designed to inform the development or validation of ClinROs. Contexts were varied across neurodegenerative and autoimmune conditions. Across studies, concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with patients or caregivers alongside clinical expert interviews. Visual aids and task adaptations were used to support participants’ comprehension of clinical terminology and inform scoring discussions. We propose six methodological recommendations for incorporating patient/caregiver input during ClinRO development and validation. When gathering patient/caregiver input to inform content validity, researchers should: (1) frame the purpose; (2) use multimodal supports; (3) simplify scoring for the task; (4) map language. When developing an endpoint hierarchy researchers should align endpoints with patient priorities. When informing meaningful change thresholds, researchers should elicit discussion of patient perspective. The reviewed studies confirmed that patients and caregivers could generally understand and participate in interview tasks using visual aids provided. Incorporating patient/caregiver input during ClinRO development/validation strengthens content validity and provides qualitative insights into meaningful change thresholds to inform score interpretation. Practical techniques (advance framing, visual aids, simplified scoring) support patient/caregiver engagement with complex ClinROs. Methodological recommendations are provided for incorporating patient/caregiver input into ClinRO evidence generation to inform patient-focused clinical trial measurement strategies.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Patient-reported outcomes and experience measures in the Community Pharmacy setting: Theoretical and practical framework regarding the PROMs and PREMs

The systematic measurement of PROs and PRE in community pharmacy can help improve the quality of care, promote patient engagement, optimize health outcomes, and reinforce the role of the pharmacist as a key healthcare professional in a value-based system.

A. de la Cuadra-Grande · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Making Patient-reported Outcome Measures Patient-friendly: Applying “Patient-reported Outcomes Tools: Engaging Users and Stakeholders” Guidelines to a Graphical “Report Card” for Cleft Outcomes

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as the CLEFT-Q, provide valuable insights into the psychosocial and functional well-being of patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Ideally, PROM data should not only inform clinicians and researchers but should also be shared back with patients and families;...

Elaine Lin, Marina S. Sawires, Katie Brown et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Informing the Development of a Conceptual Framework for a Diagnostic Radiology-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Instruments, and Gaps.

The radiology patient-centered outcome space is sufficiently well-characterized to justify dedicated PROM development, yet no broadly applicable instrument has demonstrated content validity for routine adult diagnostic radiology, providing the empirical and conceptual foundation for the proposed CLARITY PROM program.

Rakhshan Kamran, Danial Aminaei, Benjamin Rehany et al. · 2 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on a transdiagnostic experience sampling and ecological momentary intervention protocol.

BACKGROUND Experience Sampling Method (ESM) and Ecological Momentary Interventions (EMI) are promising tools for person-centered mental health care, yet evidence on prolonged transdiagnostic monitoring remains limited. AIMS This study explored service users' and clinicians' perspectives on the usability and clinical...

Adam Kurilla, Daniel Dančík, Radoslav Lošonský et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Planning a Clinical Practice Guideline Revision for a Core Set of Outcome Measures in Adults Undergoing Neurologic Physical Therapy, Part 2: Determining Stakeholders' Uptake and Recommendations

ABSTRACT Objective To determine the uptake and recommendations for revision of the 2018 Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG): Core Set Outcome Measures for Adults with Neurologic Conditions Undergoing Rehabilitation. Design Online Survey. Setting Online with participants from multiple settings. Participants Licensed physi...

J. Sullivan, Kirsten Potter, Marghuretta D. Bland et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Development of a Pediatric Oncology Financial Toxicity Outcome Measure With Content and Face Validity: The Parent-Reported Instrument of Costs and Experiences (PRICE).

A novel caregiver-reported instrument to assess financial toxicity in pediatric oncology settings, with content and face validity, is developed to address a lack of validated outcome measures of financial toxicity in pediatric oncology settings.

Timothy J. D. Ohlsen, Grace Fredman, Jacqueline Burgara et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.