Aug 2026· Comprehensive Journal of Science· 0 citations· 35 references
TL;DR
It is argued that the thoughtful integration of AI feedback with teacher feedback, grounded in pedagogical principles and human judgment, can significantly enhance L2 writing instruction.
Abstract
Writing proficiency is a key element of academic success for English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students, but it presents ongoing challenges that demand innovative pedagogical solutions. The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has created unprecedented opportunities for enhancing writing instruction through automated feedback systems. This article brings together theoretical frameworks, empirical research, and pedagogical best practices to examine how AI tools can serve as effective sources of feedback in second language (L2) writing classrooms. Drawing on cognitive, sociocultural, and contrastive rhetoric theories of writing, the article explores the nature of L2 writing difficulties, the critical role of feedback in writing development, and the strengths and limitations of AI-generated feedback. A systematic review of recent empirical studies reveals that AI-powered feedback systems are consistently effective in enhancing micro-level writing skills, particularly grammatical accuracy and lexical diversity. However, limitations remain in addressing macro-level writing concerns, and hybrid feedback models that combine AI with teacher input appear to yield the most comprehensive benefits. The article presents evidence-based recommendations for teachers and students, including strategies for scaffolding AI use, developing feedback literacy, designing effective prompts, and integrating AI feedback with teacher and peer feedback. It also addresses ethical considerations and practical concerns to ensure effective use of AI tools. It concludes with implications for pedagogy and directions for future research. This article argues that the thoughtful integration of AI feedback with teacher feedback, grounded in pedagogical principles and human judgment, can significantly enhance L2 writing instruction.
It is concluded that AI should not replace writing teachers or student authorship but should function as a supervised pedagogical resource that increases opportunities for practice, reflection, feedback, and academic language development.
K.Savitha, P. Kavinkumar· Stanzaleaf International Jou...· 0 citations
The effects of AI-supported writing instruction on tertiary-level EFL students’ language classroom engagement (LCE) and writing achievement and Qualitative findings indicated increased self-confidence and self-reflection.
N. Erdemir, Hazal Tekeli, İdil Sayın· Journal of Computer and Educ...· 0 citations
This mixed-methods study examines English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers’ perceptions of AI tools, focusing on usage practices, perceived opportunities, challenges, and professional development needs, and highlights a dual identity in teacher discourse.
Memidin Braha, Rezarta Ramadani· Open Research Europe· 0 citations
It is suggested that AI can enhance drafting, revision, and feedback processes, improving coherence, metacognition, and writing confidence, however, these benefits are accompanied by persistent concerns regarding ethical ambiguity, inconsistent policy guidance, and insufficient faculty training.
Samira Dichari, Fadi Jaber· Journal of Education and Tra...· 0 citations
GenAI is positioned as a transformative force in language education that offers technological innovation and new frameworks for inclusive, responsive, and emotionally attuned instruction.
Abderahman Rejeb, Karim Rejeb, Heba F. Zaher et al.· Quality & Quantity· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence applications, particularly adaptive learning platforms and conversational agents, effectively support reading development by giving feedback, personal learning experiences, and opportunities for learners to monitor their own progress.
Ruba Salim Abdulaziz Al Rawas, Maslawati Bint Mohammed, Intan Farahana Kamsin· Arab World English Journal· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.