Skip to content

NEXT: Physics-Informed Neuro-Spectral Exponential Time Differencing Architectures

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 40 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

This study proposes Neuro-Spectral Exponential Time Differencing Architectures (NEXT), which combines the spectral representation of the PDE solution in NeuSA with high-order exponential integrators and can be applied to inverse problems, where the model has to learn unknown parameters or boundary conditions from sparse data.

Abstract

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) build neural representations of time-dependent PDE solutions, naturally incorporating physics knowledge and observational data, which makes them well suited to both forward and inverse PDE problems. PINNs, however, are known to suffer from spectral bias and lack of causality. Neuro-Spectral Architectures (NeuSA), a recently proposed alternative to PINNs, mitigate both issues, but their numerical integration becomes unstable for stiff differential equations arising in many relevant physical problems. This study proposes Neuro-Spectral Exponential Time Differencing Architectures (NEXT), which combines the spectral representation of the PDE solution in NeuSA with high-order exponential integrators. Within this approach, the linear stiff part of the vector field induced by the PDE is integrated exactly through matrix exponentials, while the possibly nonlinear remainder is modeled by a neural network. The effectiveness of NEXT is verified through benchmark experiments on a set of stiff PDEs, in which NEXT is stable and accurate while NeuSA diverges numerically. It is also shown that NEXT can be applied to inverse problems, where the model has to learn unknown parameters or boundary conditions from sparse data. All code used in this work is publicly available at: https://github.com/marcioh2m/next.git .

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

CI-PINN: Causal Integral Physics-Informed Neural Network for Solving Evolution Equations

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) solve partial differential equations (PDEs) by incorporating governing physical laws into the training loss. For evolution equations, however, their conventional pointwise space--time representation does not explicitly encode temporal dependence, which can hinder accurate predic...

Xiao-Dong Feng, Zi-Yue Sun, Tao Tang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Variational Physics-Informed Neural Network with Functional Constraints Based on Operator Self-Adjointness

Experiments show that FC-VPINN achieves approximately one-order-of-magnitude lower prediction errors than the traditional PINN and reduces memory usage to 40% of that required by the baseline, demonstrating improved accuracy and computational efficiency in multidimensional problems.

Wenjie Zhang, Yu-Bo Li, Wei-Dong Cui et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Physics-informed neural networks and neural operators for PDEs: A review of architectures, training pathologies, and method selection.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and neural operators are increasingly used to learn solutions and solution operators for partial differential equations, but the literature remains fragmented across architectures, training objectives, and benchmark protocols. This review organizes these developments for a neura...

Namhyeon Kim, Mukhiddin Toshpulatov, Suan Lee · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Physics-Integrated Operator Learning via Gaussian Splatting Representations

Neural operators provide efficient surrogates for spatiotemporal PDE systems, but purely data-driven formulations often accumulate substantial errors during long-horizon autoregressive prediction and may fail to exploit available governing-equation structure. Existing approaches incorporate physics primarily through re...

Ji-Hao Zhang, Jun-Yi Guo, Jian-Xun Wang · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Transolver-$\sigma$: Joint Spectral-Physical Subspace Modeling for Neural PDE Solving

Across five well-established PDE benchmarks spanning steady-state prediction and time-dependent dynamics, Transolver$ achieves state-of-the-art with a benchmark-averaged relative error reduction of 33.4% over the strongest baseline for each metric, while consistently improving autoregressive rollout over single-operato...

Haonan Shangguan, Hang Zhou, Haixu Wu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Real-time inverse solutions via neural matrix operators

NEMO demonstrates comparable inverse performance to a state-of-the-art multiple-input neural operator, while reducing online computational complexity by over an order of magnitude and providing real-time uncertainty quantification.

Julie V. Pham, Thomas O'Leary-Roseberry, O. Ghattas et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.