Jul 2026· Open Mind· Vol 10, pp. 1213 - 1252· 0 citations· 181 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The central contributions of this paper articulate the conditions under which distributional predictability threatens the internal validity of an experiment and provide concrete recommendations for how to control for this potential confound.
Abstract
Abstract In order to ask questions about the mechanisms underpinning human cognition, researchers must control for properties of stimuli that could confound detected effects. In experiments involving linguistic stimuli, this includes properties like frequency, length, and neighborhood size of those stimuli, which are known to affect behavioral and neural responses. With improvements in the performance and usability of language models, it is now possible to also control for how predictable stimuli and their parts are, on the basis of the distributions of words alone: their distributional predictability. This coincides with a resurgence of interest in the possibility that statistical language learning may underlie a broad range of human cognitive phenomena; indeed, there are both theoretical and empirical reasons to believe that humans rely on distributional information during certain cognitive tasks. This creates a confound, whereby experimental operationalizations of psychological constructs with linguistic stimuli may not in fact be testing what they are intended to test. Thus, the central contributions of this paper are twofold: first, we articulate the conditions under which distributional predictability threatens the internal validity of an experiment; and second, we provide concrete recommendations for how to control for this potential confound. Beyond these primary contributions, we survey techniques for measuring distributional predictability, review theoretical and empirical work supporting the role of distributional statistics in human cognition, and present several case studies illustrating the range of possible outcomes—from the “distributional baselines” only marginally affecting theoretical inferences to constituting fully deflationary confounds. We also enumerate and address potential objections to this approach. This paper is primarily intended for researchers in psychology, cognitive science, and linguistics who use linguistic stimuli but have not yet incorporated distributional baselines into their work.
Small cognitively fine-tuned models show promise as noise ceiling estimators for psychological experiments, though their scope remains bounded by the paradigms seen in training.
Human language processing can be studied through both behavior and brain activity, yet it remains unclear whether these two data types reflect sensitivity to the same information. One influential view holds that both behavioral and neural responses are largely determined by processing effort, often estimated by word su...
Andrea Gregor de Varda, Y. Berzak, Evelina Fedorenko et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Linguistic typology has identified properties shared by the world’s languages, as well as features with respect to which languages diverge, including infrequent or rare phenomena. Cognitive biases are one important source of language universals, through their indirect effect on language change via their impact on langu...
Antonio Benítez-Burraco, Sihan Chen, D. Gil· Linguistic Typology at the C...· 0 citations
Statistical learning (SL) - the ability to detect patterns in sensory input without explicit instruction - is crucial for building internal models of the environment. In humans, it notably supports language acquisition, including word segmentation and grammar learning. Evidence across primates, songbirds, rodents, and...
Laure Tosatto, A. Avarguès-Weber· Current Opinion in Neurobiol...· 0 citations
These findings demonstrate that LMs can recover human-like linguistic generalizations from impoverished input and provide a controlled framework for investigating the mechanisms underlying such biases.