BaRe-Mem, an online Bayesian reliability memory for multi-agent consultation, is introduced, an online Bayesian reliability memory for multi-agent consultation that estimates advisor reliability based on the central model's internal belief representations and updates these estimates from historical interactions.
Abstract
In multi-agent systems, reliable consultation is challenging because advisor capabilities vary across tasks, and misleading information can make consultation worse than autonomous reasoning. We introduce BaRe-Mem, an online Bayesian reliability memory for multi-agent consultation. It estimates advisor reliability based on the central model's internal belief representations and updates these estimates from historical interactions. These estimates modulate the influence of advisor responses and guide the choice between consultation and autonomous reasoning. Across nine benchmarks and six central models, BaRe-Mem is more robust to misleading advisor information than debate and majority voting. On the more challenging tasks, it remains above autonomous reasoning across all tested misleading levels. Moreover, we extend the BaRe-Mem mechanism to worker allocation in agent teams. On the MuSiQue benchmark, BaRe-Mem improves task completion over routing by historical success counts and identifies capable workers earlier.
This work proposes R$^2$-MAD (Remember and Reweight for Multi-Agent Debate), a framework that equips agents with an experience memory accumulated from past debates that achieves consistent improvements over existing single-agent and MAD baselines.
Xuan-Fa Jin, Zhijian Ma, Yong-Cheng Zeng et al.· 0 citations
LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) have attracted growing attention for improving reasoning through interaction among multiple agents. In this work, we focus on parallel multi-agent reasoning systems, where several agents solve the same problem over multiple rounds and aggregate their outputs into a final answer. Desp...
Tun-Yu Zhang, Zi-Hao Zhao, Yu-Song Zhao et al.· 0 citations
Agent evaluations are increasingly used to compare LLMs and inform deployment decisions, yet ranks can reflect not only the model but also the effects of the evaluation conditions such as the scaffolds or tasks. This makes reliability claim-dependent: an evaluation that reliably ranks deployed systems may not reliably...
Michael Hardy, Ruhana Azam, Anka Reuel et al.· 0 citations
BayesBeliefAgent is introduced, which pairs a hierarchical LLM planner with a Bayesian tracking module and evaluates performance using replanning efficiency and the belief-action gap: the fraction of total decisions where an agent with a correct partner estimate executes a non-complementary skill.
Harsh Goel, Aditya Sai Ellendula, Vaishnav Tadiparthi et al.· 1 citation
Multi-agent reasoning systems often use agreement, confidence, or automated scores to decide which messages should shape a final answer. Such filtering assumes that a message likely to be correct is also worth keeping. Yet a wrong answer can contain a useful decomposition, constraint, or scientific principle. We test t...
Chih-Hsuan Yang, Anjir Ahmed Chowdhury, Cheng-Hau Yang et al.· 2 citations
The hypothesis that cognitive diversity among agents is the driver of multi-agent debate gains is tested, in the setting where the question is still measurable: small open-weight models with benchmark headroom.
L. Ferreira, Gardenia Liu, K. Zheng· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.