Not Every Term Adds New Structure: Sobolev Novelty for Symbolic Regression
TL;DR
Sobolev Novelty is introduced, a term-level measure of structural independence for symbolic equations, which can be incorporated into diverse SR paradigms to support term pruning, search guidance, LLM feedback, and data selection, yielding consistent performance gains and demonstrating broad applicability.
Abstract
Symbolic regression (SR) aims to discover compact and meaningful mathematical equations from data, but searching the vast combinatorial space of symbolic structures remains challenging. Existing methods typically guide this process using expression-level objectives, such as fitting error, which assess a candidate equation as a whole but provide little information about whether an individual term contributes genuinely new structure or is largely redundant with the rest of the expression. We introduce \textbf{Sobolev Novelty}, a term-level measure of structural independence for symbolic equations. For each term, we construct an empirical Sobolev signature from its function values and exact derivatives over the observed inputs, and quantify how much of this behavior cannot be reconstructed by the remaining terms. We further derive a theory-calibrated threshold, yielding a principled and tuning-free criterion for identifying structurally novel terms. Using this threshold, 92.6\% of terms in benchmark ground-truth equations exhibit sufficient structural novelty, compared with only 38.3\% on average for expressions produced by 15 SR methods, revealing a substantial gap between scientific equations and current SR solutions. As a lightweight plug-in, Sobolev Novelty can be incorporated into diverse SR paradigms to support term pruning, search guidance, LLM feedback, and data selection, yielding consistent performance gains and demonstrating broad applicability.
