Skip to content
Review

Can AI assist in reducing diagnostic error? A narrative review

Jul 2026 · Diagnosis · 0 citations · 147 references
Medicine

TL;DR

It is concluded that AI tools have matured to the extent that they can improve diagnostic decision-making of clinicians and can assist institutions in increasing diagnostic safety.

Abstract

Abstract Diagnostic error, defined as missed, wrong, or delayed diagnoses or those not communicated to patients, is common, affecting 5–10 % of hospital admissions and clinic visits. Such errors cause patient harm in up to 1 in 100 of such encounters and account for 10 % of all hospital deaths and serious adverse events. About 80 % of diagnostic errors are potentially preventable, most resulting from flaws in clinician reasoning in formulating and testing diagnostic hypotheses. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI), and large language models (LLMs) in particular, has attracted great interest in how these technologies can reduce diagnostic error within the context of bedside or clinic consultations. This narrative review aims to provide practising clinicians with a comprehensible analysis of where AI and LLMs are currently positioned in assisting diagnostic performance in clinician-patient encounters based on contemporary state-of-the-art research. It attempts to answer seven questions relevant to clinician understanding and adoption of AI/LLMs. It concludes that AI tools have matured to the extent that they can improve diagnostic decision-making of clinicians and can assist institutions in increasing diagnostic safety. The rapid development of LLMs and ongoing release of new versions necessitate continuous monitoring of their evolving diagnostic capabilities. Importantly, a balanced approach is required where LLMs work to complement, rather than replace, the nuanced diagnostic reasoning of clinicians.

View source

Similar papers

#generative ai Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative artificial intelligence in clinical reasoning and differential diagnosis in internal medicine.

A narrative review of the available evidence presents a narrative review of the available evidence on the effect of LLMs on diagnostic reasoning, the optimal design of clinician-LLM interaction, the appropriate timing of consultation during the clinical encounter, the safest models of clinical-AI integration, and the m...

L. Corral-Gudino, M. Ramos-Casals, M. Marcos et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Beyond bias: using AI to reduce diagnostic noise and manage novelty in clinical reasoning

Abstract Objectives This study examines AI’s capacity to mitigate noise-related diagnostic errors, evaluates its impact on accuracy, and explores the interplay between AI-driven efficiency and human clinical reasoning, particularly in rare or complex cases. Background: Diagnostic errors in clinical reasoning are signif...

A. Pietarinen · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

AI-Powered Prescription Error Detection Using Large Language Models (LLMs): A Systematic Review and Future Perspectives

It is concluded that LLM-based decision-support tools hold substantial promise as complementary — rather than autonomous — decision-support systems capable of transforming medication safety and pharmacy practice.

K. K. Kumar, Koyya Gowtham Reddy, K. Reddy · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Reasoning in Real World Clinical Care: Why Large Language Models Are Not Yet Safe for Autonomous Clinical Decision Support

This Perspective concerns the most consequential of these applications: the autonomous triage of self-presenting, undifferentiated patients, with little or no clinician in the loop, and the evidence of safety does not yet exist.

Shayndhan Sivanathan, Shravan Nageswaran, Mehdi Zadem et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

From Algorithm to Bedside: A Clinician's Framework for AI in Practice

This article proposes seven questions that clinicians can run through to evaluate any clinical AI tool in the time it takes to read an abstract, alongside a traffic-light schema for matching oversight to risk and a short list of demands clinicians should make of vendors and institutions.

Alaa Abdelqader, M. Alkhateeb, Abdullah Al-Marrawi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.