The geographic coordinate robustness of Tessera v1, Tessera v1.1, and AlphaEarth is evaluated by testing whether coordinates can be predicted from the embedding representations using 284 quality-verified European solar farms from 2024.
Abstract
Earth-observation (EO) foundation models provide reusable embeddings, yet downstream task accuracy does not reveal whether these representations encode geographic information, which may be beneficial for location-aware applications but potentially detrimental when representations invariant to geographic location are desired. We therefore evaluate the geographic coordinate robustness of Tessera v1, Tessera v1.1, and AlphaEarth by testing whether coordinates can be predicted from the embedding representations using 284 quality-verified European solar farms from 2024. We assessed geographic information content information through the association between cosine and geodesic distances and through prediction of projected coordinates in EPSG:3035. Embeddings from all three EO foundation models contain recoverable geographic information. All prediction models significantly outperform training-range uniform random sampling baselines, with AlphaEarth exhibiting the strongest distance association and lowest mean geodesic error. Both Tessera variants also yielded higher geographic distance correlations than the Sentinel-2 controls. These findings motivate geographic information content as an additional criterion for auditing EO foundation models.
This survey reviews the development of Earth embeddings from foundation model pretraining and reusable encoders to global and near-global embedding products, and summarizes the technical and scientific challenges surrounding global embedding products.
Frozen geospatial foundation model (GeoFM) embeddings are increasingly used as general-purpose features, yet their reliability under cross-city transfer remains unclear. We evaluate AlphaEarth and TESSERA for building-function and local-climate-zone mapping across 31 cities using leave-one-city-out (LOCO) transfer, com...
Jungoung Kim, Hunsoo Song· IEEE Geoscience and Remote S...· 0 citations
MoRAX, a lightweight framework for augmenting geospatial embeddings with functional structure derived from human mobility, is introduced and transfer results across countries further demonstrate that modulation conditioned on mobility flows provides a general mechanism for grounding geospatial foundations in the human...
Ya Wen, Jixuan Cai, Yu-Lun Zhou et al.· 0 citations
Geospatial representation learning from satellite imagery is a fundamental problem for large-scale urban analysis and real-world applications. Despite recent advances, current methods struggle with cross-region generalization and semantic interpretability due to their reliance on region-specific auxiliary data and the...
Yutian Jiang, Jiabo Liu, Xixuan Hao et al.· 1 citation
Ecosystems and the services they provide are essential for life but continue to undergo degradation worldwide. Satellite remote sensing has been essential for environmental mapping for decades, but can suffer poor accuracy when applied to mapping terrestrial ecosystems. Geospatial Foundation Models (GeoFMs) integrate d...
George W. Lucas, Benjamin J. Cresswell, S. Duce et al.· Remote Sensing· 0 citations
Spatial prediction requires determining how sampled observations support estimates at unsampled locations. Existing methods commonly represent these relationships in geographic space, environmental feature space, or through a global statistical relationship between predictors and the target property. We propose a dual-...
Peng-Tao Guo, Mao-Fen Li· ISPRS International Journal...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.