Skip to content
Open access

Bridging Engineering and Ethics: A Framework for Responsible AI-Driven Software Development

Aug 2026 · Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences · 0 citations · 2 references

TL;DR

A comprehensive model for integrating ethical standards into the phases of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is proposed, founded on the pillars of fairness, transparency, accountability, and sustainability, offering practical recommendations aimed at developers, organizations, and policymakers.

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into software systems has witnessed rapid evolution, yielding substantial benefits for society; however, it has concurrently given rise to serious ethical challenges. This paper explores the necessity of adopting the concepts of "Ethical AI" and "Responsible Software Development" to ensure the alignment of technological innovations with human values and societal well-being. The study examines prominent issues such as lack of transparency, privacy infringement, and environmental impacts, emphasizing the urgent need for frameworks to govern the practices of developing and deploying AI systems. Drawing upon previous studies and industrial policies, the paper proposes a comprehensive model for integrating ethical standards into the phases of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). This model is founded on the pillars of fairness, transparency, accountability, and sustainability, offering practical recommendations aimed at developers, organizations, and policymakers. By presenting this systematic approach, the paper aims to enrich the ongoing discourse on AI ethics, build trust, and promote inclusivity and sustainable societal benefit

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Governing Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Research: The ARCHON Framework — Ethical Requirements Derived from Technical Architecture

This paper proposes the ARCHON framework, a set of ten requirements derived from the technical architecture of AI systems, to facilitate ethical compliance of scientific research for experts and practicioners engaging in roles such as proposal evaluators, project officers, ethics board members, or research administrato...

Jesus Manuel Benitez Baleato · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

BEYOND COMPLIANCE: EMBEDDING ETHICS-BY-DESIGN IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS UNDER THE EU AI ACT

The study concludes that ethics-by-design is a necessary condition for the legitimacy of AI governance in the EU, and identifies key mechanisms for such integration, including ethical impact assessments, algorithmic auditing, transparency tools, and human oversight.

T. Hajiyev · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

The ethics behind the use of artificial intelligence in architectural design

An ethical framework for integrating AI into architectural practice is proposed, advocating for balanced and inclusive approaches that prioritise societal values, environmental stewardship, and professional integrity.

M. Kurcjusz, A. Stefańska, N. Cortiços et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

From Innovation to Integrity: Why Africa's Artificial Intelligence Future Depends on Ethics

The growing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) makes the implementation of ethical principles for its development and application a pressing issue worldwide. This concern is particularly urgent for African countries, which, while having significant potential for growth in the AI sphere, are currently in the early stag...

Andrey Ochepovsky, Yuliya Shlychkova, Gladys Yiadom · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

AI Regulations, Governance and Ethical Considerations: An Indian Perspective

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in economic systems, public administration and social life across all regions. While AI offers significant opportunities for innovation and sustainable development, it also raises complex regulatory, governance and ethical challenges. This paper examines emerging ap...

Rajesh Kumar Pathak, O. P. Gupta, Misha Kapoor et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Ethical risk assessment of AI in practice: a proposal of the methodology for organisational application

Three steps of the ENACT methodology are described and details three steps of the ENACT methodology and its potential and limitations for qualitative ethical risk assessment of AI in organisational settings are discussed.

N. Murashova, Leonora Onarheim Bergsjø, Heidi Dahl et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.