Ethical risk assessment of AI in practice: a proposal of the methodology for organisational application
TL;DR
Three steps of the ENACT methodology are described and details three steps of the ENACT methodology and its potential and limitations for qualitative ethical risk assessment of AI in organisational settings are discussed.
Abstract
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) is incorporated into the workflow, several ethical issues and risks which can cause actual harms are being introduced. Despite the well-established frameworks of ethical AI principles, there are few practice-oriented approaches for structured interdisciplinary assessment of the ethical aspects associated with AI use and design. To supply the principles and address the increasing focus on AI-risks from an ethical perspective, an Ethical risk assessmeNt of Ai iN pracTice (ENACT) methodology is proposed. To develop ENACT together with a cross-sectoral, interdisciplinary consortium of Norwegian private and public businesses, the core principles of Design-Based Research (DBR) were applied including real context orientation, collaborative partnership and focus on testing and multiple interactions. Four aspects of the ENACT methodology were collaboratively developed and tested and are proposed in this paper including format, structure, scope and support tools. This paper describes and details three steps of the ENACT methodology and discusses its potential and limitations for qualitative ethical risk assessment of AI in organisational settings.