Skip to content
Open access

The AI-educated patient

Feb 2026 · Digital Health · Vol 12 · 0 citations · 23 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The concept of the “AI-educated patient” and a related conceptual framework, “soft accountability”, are introduced, describing the informal pressure that may arise when well-informed patients enter consultations with structured expectations.

Abstract

Patients increasingly consult generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools before and after clinical encounters. We argue this represents a qualitative shift beyond the “Dr. Google” era: large language models (LLMs) synthesise information into coherent, guideline-framed narratives that may raise the baseline knowledge patients bring to consultations. We introduce the concept of the “AI-educated patient” and a related conceptual framework, “soft accountability”, describing the informal pressure that may arise when well-informed patients enter consultations with structured expectations. We discuss potential mechanisms by which AI-mediated patient education could influence clinician behaviour, while framing these explicitly as hypotheses awaiting empirical testing. Substantial risks remain, including hallucinations, false patient confidence, inequities in AI access and literacy, clinician workload implications, and privacy concerns. The opportunity and challenge is to harness this shift equitably for both sides of the clinical relationship.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Artificial intelligence dependency in college students: a critical narrative review

This critical narrative review synthesizes evidence from the past decade on AI dependency among college students, focusing on conceptualizations, theoretical frameworks, prevalence and demographic variations, measurement tools, determinants, intervention strategies, and research gaps.

Xuehua He, Shan Li, Rongping Cha et al. · 1 citation
Open access Aug 2026

Precision education in the era of AI: promise, pitfalls, and the data divide.

This commentary articulates how the medical education community must thoughtfully address policy and technical challenges to help AI reach its potential to enhance physician training.

B. Thoma, T. Chan · 0 citations
#generative ai Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative artificial intelligence in clinical reasoning and differential diagnosis in internal medicine.

A narrative review of the available evidence presents a narrative review of the available evidence on the effect of LLMs on diagnostic reasoning, the optimal design of clinician-LLM interaction, the appropriate timing of consultation during the clinical encounter, the safest models of clinical-AI integration, and the m...

L. Corral-Gudino, M. Ramos-Casals, M. Marcos et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

The Challenge of Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Reasoning by Augmenting the Physician's Central Cognitive Role.

This Commentary proposes that repeated, methodologically guided dialogue with personalised large language models-termed Clinical Cognitive Interaction-progressively imprints the physician's epistemic signature onto a personalised exocortex, giving rise to an emergent Human-LLM Cognitive Unit.

S. Corrao · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Beyond Algorithms: Human-Centered Explainability for Clinicians, Patients, and Caregivers

Two short vignettes and a design guide to help human factors researchers create explanation systems that are practical and trustworthy are presented to show how explainability can become part of the care system instead of being treated as a separate technical feature.

T. Mamun, Laurie Novak, M. Salwei · 1 citation
Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative artificial intelligence in medical education: from knowledge assessment to clinical reasoning and professional competence

GenAI should be viewed as a powerful augmentative tool, not a replacement for human educators, and its successful integration will depend on leveraging its strengths to enhance efficiency and scalability while preserving the essential humanistic elements of medical practice through expert oversight and validation.

R. Xie, Bei-En Zhang, Li-Feng Xiao · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.