Aug 2026· Interdisciplinary Journal of Critical Communications· 0 citations· 18 references
TL;DR
It is concluded that originality, authorship, integrity, fairness, and transparency are interdependent concerns rather than separate issues, and that responsible AI use is best understood as a disciplined, disclosed collaboration with a non-author tool.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly transitioned from a research curiosity to a fundamental component of the infrastructure of teaching, research, writing, supervision, and publishing. This conceptual paper contends that the current academic discourse, framed as a binary between prohibition and permission, inadequately addresses the ethical challenges at hand. Drawing upon global AI ethical guidelines, scholarship on academic integrity, and publisher policies, the paper proposes that the ethical utilisation of AI in academic writing should be governed by a coherent system of accountability rather than by isolated regulations. It introduces an original framework, the TRACE model, Transparency, Responsibility, Authorship-accountability, Comprehension, and Equity, as an integrative conceptual tool for educators, researchers, supervisors, editors, and policymakers. This article concludes that originality, authorship, integrity, fairness, and transparency are interdependent concerns rather than separate issues, and that responsible AI use is best understood as a disciplined, disclosed collaboration with a non-author tool.
Examination of the legal and ethical perspectives of use of generative AI in academic backgrounds through a doctrinal and thematic analysis of recent scholarship, institutional guidance and evolving governing instruments concludes that transparent disclosure frameworks, redesigned assessment practices and layered gover...
Unknown authors· Revue Internationale du Law...· 0 citations
This paper proposes the ARCHON framework, a set of ten requirements derived from the technical architecture of AI systems, to facilitate ethical compliance of scientific research for experts and practicioners engaging in roles such as proposal evaluators, project officers, ethics board members, or research administrato...
Jesus Manuel Benitez Baleato· Open Research Europe· 0 citations
The letter argues that AI does not eliminate the author; rather, it radically reconfigures authorship as a form of epistemic stewardship grounded in context, ethics, positionality, and intellectual judgement, which argues for reforms in peer review and editorial processes to distinguish between linguistic fluency and g...
Rugare Mugumbate, Augustina Naami, Kabo Diraditsile et al.· African Journal of Social Wo...· 0 citations
The study contributes an operational, value-based model that complements rather than displaces existing regulatory approaches, offering developers, regulators, and Shariah boards a design vocabulary for anticipating harm before deployment.
Maman Supardi, Hilmiy Hanif, Mursyid Rahman et al.· West Science Islamic Studies· 0 citations
This book offers a clear, concise introduction to trustworthy AI, treating AI not just as a technical artifact but as a socio-technical system embedded in human contexts, designed for teaching and learning in computer science, data science, law, policy, business, and related fields.
Andrea Aler Tubella, Virginia Dignum, Marçal Mora-Cantallops et al.· 0 citations
It is concluded that AI should serve as an augmentative rather than substitutive technology in peer review, with robust governance frameworks, transparent disclosure mechanisms, and continuous evaluation of equity implications essential for responsible implementation.
Aras Bozkurt· International Review of Rese...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.